Social Predictors of Prosocial Behavior Among Filipino Adolescent College Students
Adrian S. Giron | Melvin C. Pamintuan | Danica G. Baluyut | Cherique Ann G. Granada | Crizza Ann C. Nonato | Christian Khiel Unto | Princess Arianne Q. Sison
Discipline: psychology (non-specific)
Abstract:
Prosocial behavior is an important developmental outcome in adolescence, yet studies in the
Filipino context are limited, particularly in understanding the role of social factors. This study aimed to
examine how empathy, moral reasoning, and social influences from parents, peers, and school predict
prosocial behavior among Filipino adolescent college students. Using a descriptive-correlational design,
data were collected from 100 participants aged 18–21 years through standardized online questionnaires:
Prosocialness Scale for Adults, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Schutte Self-Report Emotional
Intelligence Test (moral reasoning), Parent–Adult Child Relationship Questionnaire, Peer Relationships
Scale, and Positive Youth Development Scale. Results indicated high levels of moral reasoning (M=125.0,
SD=13.5) and empathy (M=47.7, SD=8.2), while scores for parental influence (M=53.3, SD=11.3), peer
relationships (M=15.6, SD=2.5), school environment (M=83.5, SD=14.8), and prosocial behavior (M=65.3,
SD=9.7) were moderate. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between prosocial
behavior and moral reasoning (r=0.49, p<0.01), empathy (r=0.29, p<0.01), parental influence (r=0.32,
p<0.01), and school environment (r=0.43, p<0.01), with no significant correlation for peer influence.
Multiple regression analysis indicated moral reasoning (B=0.33, p<0.05) as the strongest predictor,
accounting for 23.9% of variance in prosocial behavior (F[5,74]=5.96, p<0.001). This suggests that, within
this Filipino adolescent group, internalized moral values are more pivotal in shaping prosocial behavior
compared to empathy or external social influences. These findings underline the importance of designing
culturally responsive programs that specifically enhance moral reasoning to foster prosocial behaviors
among Filipino adolescents effectively.
References:
- Bergin, C. (2014). Educating students to be prosocial at school. In L. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), The multidimensionality of prosocial behavior: Biological, socialization, and contextual perspectives (pp. 279–304). Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/38edxj5y
- Bowen, C. E., Spuling, S. M., Kornadt, A. E., & Wiest, M. (2019). Young people feel wise and older people feel energetic: Comparing age stereotypes and self-evaluations across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 16(2), 171–180. https://tinyurl.com/y2mzftut
- Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2020). With a little help from their peers: The impact of classmates on adolescents' development of prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8
- Datu, J. A. D., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). The blessings of social-oriented virtues: Interpersonal character strengths are linked to increased life satisfaction and academic success among Filipino high school students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 983–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620906294
- David, E. J. R., Sharma, D. K. B., & Petalio, J. (2017). Losing kapwa: Colonial legacies and the Filipino American family. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 43–55.
- https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000068
- Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814
- Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2023). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 610–658). Wiley. https://tinyurl.com/4ct4pc9s.
- Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
- Flynn, H. K., Felmlee, D. H., Shu, X., & Conger, R. D. (2018). Mothers and fathers matter: The influence of parental support, hostility, and problem-solving on adolescent friendships. Journal of Family Issues, 39(8), 2389–2412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755423
- Guerrero, A. P. S., Nishimura, S. T., Chang, J. Y., Ona, C., Cunanan, V. L., & Hishinuma, E. S. (2019). Low cultural identification, low parental involvement and adverse peer influences as risk factors for delinquent behaviour among Filipino youth in Hawai'i. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 56(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764009102772
- Hastings, P. D., & Miller, J. G. (2022). Prosocial behavior and moral development in adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070220
- Jin, S., Balliet, D., Romano, A., Spadaro, G., van Lissa, C. J., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gutzkow, B., & Kreienkamp, J. (2021). Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110535
- Klein, N. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1209541
- Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Eisenberg, N., Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Gerbino, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2017). Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behavior in Colombian adolescents. Child Development, 88(4), 1100–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12863
- Malonda, E., Llorca, A., Mesurado, B., Samper, P., & Mestre, M. V. (2019). Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2379 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379
- Mestre, M. V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Malonda, E., & Llorca Mestre, A. (2019). Bidirectional relations among empathy-related traits, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 28(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12366
- Scott, K., & Yu, G. (2022). Moral decision making in adolescents: The effects of peer attachment, interpersonal affect, and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 94(3), 442–456.
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12015
- Silke, C., Brady, B., Boylan, C., & Dolan, P. (2018). Factors influencing the development of empathy and prosocial behavior among adolescents: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 421– 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.027
- Simon-Thomas, E. R. (2020). Find social media frustrating? Try empathy. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/43d8fxjk
- Syamsu, Y., Ilfiandra, & Sofwan, A. (2020). The effect of parenting patterns and empathy behavior on youth prosocial. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 223–232.
- https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13315a
- Van de Groep, S., Zanolie, K., Green, K. H., Sweijen, S. W., & Crone, E. A. (2020). A daily diary study on adolescents’ mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240349
- Wang, H., Wu, S., & Wei, C. (2021). Emotional intelligence and prosocial behavior in college students: A moderated mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713227.
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713227
- Yeo, J. H., & Kim, J. S. (2021). The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire. Healthcare (Basel), 9(7), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070808
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)