Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 46 no. 10 (2025)

Exploring Universal Design for Learning in an Inclusive Educational Landscape: A Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Ruth Llorando Pepito-Orilla

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Low learning competence of students in an inclusive classroom is a problem in the field of education. This research aimed to determine the significance of the combined degree of influence of multiple means of representation, engagement, action, and expression on learning competence. Employing Multiple Linear Regression Analysis involving 300 samples selected via a non-probability sampling technique, the researcher found that the predictor variables had a 37% significant combined degree of influence on the criterion variable. However, of the three predictors, only one was found to have a significant impact. Hence, the UDL theory was partially affirmed. Consequently, prioritizing programs that capacitate teachers and parents to enhance UDL implementation and curriculum integration, while advocating for further exploration of UDL theory through studies with diverse learners and qualitative research methods, is recommended.



References:

  1. AbdElsamie, A. (2023). 7 innovative teaching strategies to engage students in online learning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/innovative-teaching-strategies-to-engage-students-in-online-learning#google_vignette
  2. Ainscow, M. (2024). Every learner matters and matters equally: Making education inclusive. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388991
  3. Ainscow, M., & Messiou, K. (2018). Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education. Journal of Educational Change, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9312-1
  4. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
  5. Ali, N., Kasim, T. S. a. T., & Siren, N. R. (2021). Issues and challenges in 21st-century learning of special education (hearing impaired) in Islamic education. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(9), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.1019
  6. Al Jaffal, M. (2022). Barriers general education teachers face regarding the inclusion of students with autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873248
  7. Almeqdad, Q., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2218191
  8. Andrade, C. (2019). The P value and statistical significance: misunderstandings, explanations, challenges, and alternatives. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(3), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_193_19
  9. Assessment: evaluating learners’ progress and achievements. (2021). LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/assessment-evaluating-learners-progress-achievements-lewis/
  10. Basham, J., Gardner, J., & Smith, S. (2020). Measuring the implementation of UDL in classrooms and schools: Initial field test results. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520908015
  11. Bhandari, P. (2023, May 12). What is quantitative research? Scribbr. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/
  12. Bruckner, S., & Nunn, N. (2023, April 27). Universal design for learning: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. EDC. Retrieved from https://www.edc.org/blog/universal-design-learning-meeting-needs-diverse-learners
  13. Canter, L., King, L., Williams, J., Metcalf, D., & Myrick Potts, K. (2017). Evaluating pedagogy and practice of universal design for learning in public schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27(1), 1–16.
  14. CAST. (2021). The UDL school implementation & certification criteria self-assessment. UDL Implementation and Research Network, CAST Professional Learning, and Learning Designed (™). ISBN 978-1-930583-93-1 (PDF).
  15. Chambers, D., & Coffey, A. (2019). Guidelines for designing middle school transition using universal design for learning principles. Improving Schools, 22(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218817984
  16. Dari, L. (2023). Diversity and equity in education: Fostering inclusive learning environments. Teacher Academy. Retrieved from https://www.teacheracademy.eu/blog/inclusive-learning/
  17. Data Privacy Act. (2022). Data Privacy Act. National Privacy Commission. Retrieved from https://privacy.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2022/01/DPA_QuickGuidefolder_10191.pdf
  18. Dichoso, E. J. (2024). Fostering a positive school climate to enhance senior high school students’ experience. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31875.89122
  19. Dzaman, S., Fenlon, D., Maier, J., & Marchione, T. (2022). Universal design for learning: One small step. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Retrieved from https://udloncampus.cast.org/page/udl_overview
  20. Evmenova, A. (2018). Preparing teachers to use Universal Design for Learning to support diverse learners. ERIC. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184985.pdf
  21. Frost, J. (2018). How to interpret P-values and coefficients in regression analysis. Statistics by Jim. Retrieved from https://statisticsbyjim.com/regression/interpret-coefficients-p-values-regression/
  22. Hayes, A. (2023). Multiple linear regression (MLR) definition, formula, and example. Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mlr.asp
  23. Kampen, M. (2023). 37 powerful teaching strategies to level up learning in 2023. Prodigy Game. Retrieved from https://www.prodigygame.com/main-en/blog/teaching-strategies/
  24. Lin, N. (2018). Digital assessment tools: What is their impact on a teacher’s work? eLearning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/digital-assessment-tools-impact-teachers-work
  25. Madrazo, G. M. B. (2020). The plight of receiving teachers: A story to tell. [Publisher/Source Needed]
  26. Mahbobi, M., & Tiemann, T. K. (2015). Introductory business statistics with interactive spreadsheets. BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/introductorybusinessstatistics/
  27. Main, P. (2021). Bloom’s taxonomy. Structural Learning. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/blooms-taxonomy-a-teachers-alternative
  28. Markou, P., & Díaz-Noguera, M. D. (2022). Investigating the implementation of universal design for learning in Greek secondary and second chance schools through teachers’ reflections Dayle learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1851
  29. Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30 51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
  30. Nah, Y.-H., & Neo, H.-M. (2023). Influence of rigid/ritualistic behavioral profiles of students with autism spectrum disorder on special education teachers’ perceptions of their readiness for supported employment. The Journal of Special Education, 57(2), 73 82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221113805
  31. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en
  32. Pappas, C. (2023). What is performance-based assessment? eLearning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/what-is-performance-based-assessment
  33. Pappas, M., Papoutsi, C., & Drigas, A. (2018). Policies, practices and attitudes toward inclusive education: The case of Greece. Social Sciences, 7(6), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7060090
  34. Posey, A. (n.d.). Universal design for learning (UDL): A teacher’s guide. Understood. Retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/articles/understanding-universal-design-for-learning
  35. Priyadharsini, V., & Mary, S. (2024). Universal design for learning (UDL) in inclusive education: Accelerating learning for all. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(4), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i4.7489
  36. Republic Act No. 10532. (2013). Republic Act No. 10532. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/07/republic-act-no-10532/
  37. Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal design for learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677
  38. Shabiralyani, G., Hasan, K. S., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process case research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of Education and Practice. Retrieved from www.iiste.org
  39. Singh, G. K. S., Ahmad, I., Baharudin, S. N. A., & Ngadni, I. (2023). Challenges faced by teachers in inclusive classrooms in early childhood education (ECE) setting. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/17267
  40. Stapleton-Corcoran, E. (2022). Universal design for learning (UDL). Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence at the University of Illinois Chicago. Retrieved from https://teaching.uic.edu/cate-teaching-guides/inclusive-equity-minded-teaching-practices/universal-design-for-learning-udl/
  41. Thomas, E., Lembke, E., & Gandhi, A. (2023). Universal design for learning within an integrated multitiered system of support. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12302
  42. Turney, S. (2024, May 10). Pearson correlation coefficient ®. Scribbr. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/pearson-correlation-coefficient/
  43. Violan, E. E. C. (2018). Checkpoints and chokepoints of SPED services of learners with special education needs in the general education program. Holy Cross of Davao College-Graduate School Library
  44. Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in universal design for learning among online university instructors. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20–41.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic