Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 46 no. 10 (2025)

The Voices of Learners: Lived Experiences of Child Labor in the Municipality of San Fernando District I

Geraldine Panglao | Lutchie Ducot

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

This study was conducted to hear and uncover the learners' voices on their experience with child labor and learners' performance in San Fernando 1 District, Division of Bukidnon, SY 2024-2025. Specifically, this study considered the voices of learners who are victims of child labor, and the emergent themes are derived from the dominant codes in adjustment challenges, as observed through learners' lived experiences. The study identified only five (5) learners who have been reported and noted as victims of child labor as far as the student records and the community records are concerned. This study followed the phenomenological qualitative research design. Purposive Sampling was used as a sampling procedure in this study. The voices of learners who have endured child labor emphasize the vital roles of perseverance, family responsibility, and education in the face of adversity. Their call for change resonates with a plea to prioritize education, eradicate exploitative practices, and pave the way for a brighter future for all children. Furthermore, the study's themes highlight the complexities of child labor, underscoring perseverance, family responsibility, and its impact on education. Learners' experiences highlight the necessity to balance familial needs with educational pursuits, shedding light on the challenges and lessons learned. Advocating for change and prioritizing education, their voices call for a collective effort to address exploitative practices and shape a more hopeful future for all affected children.



References:

  1. Abdu, A., Rabiu, I., & Usman, A. L. (2020). Effect of child labour on children’s education in Katsina State, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 74 doi.
  2. Al-Raqqad, H. K., Al-Bourini, E. S., Al Talahin, F. M., & Aranki, R. M. E. (2017). The Impact of School Bullying on Students’ Academic Achievement from the Teachers’ Point of View. International Education Studies, 10(6), 44-50.
  3. Alam, S. A. (2015). Parental health shocks, child labor, and educational outcomes: Evidence from Tanzania. Journal of Health Economics, 44, 161-175.
  4. Alford, B. L., Rollins, K. B., Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (2016). Using systematic classroom observation to explore student engagement as a function of teachers’ developmentally appropriate instructional practices (DAIP) in ethnically diverse pre-kindergarten through second-grade classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 623-635.
  5. Brown, D. K., Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (2002). The determinants of child labor: theory and evidence. School of Public Policy, University of Michigan.
  6. Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement in student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 14, 33-46.
  7. Craig, R. (2015). College disrupted: The great unbundling of higher education—St Martin’s Press.
  8. Csikszentmihalhi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette UK.
  9. Fry, D., Fang, X., Elliott, S., Casey, T., Zheng, X., Li, J., ... & McCluskey, G. (2018). The relationships between violence in childhood and educational outcomes: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Child abuse & neglect, 75, 6-28.
  10. Gamlin, J., Camacho, A. Z., Ong, M., & Hesketh, T. (2015). Is domestic work the worst form of child labour? The findings of a six-country study of the psychosocial effects of child domestic work. Children’s Geographies, 13(2), 212-225.
  11. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & education, 80, 152-161.
  12. Hill, N. E. (2015). Including fathers in the picture: A meta-analysis of parental involvement and students’ academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 919.
  13. Hindman, H. D. (2016). Child labour: an American history. Routledge.
  14. Hoff, E., & Laursen, B. (2019). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In Handbook of parenting (pp. 421-447). Routledge.
  15. Ibrahim, A., Abdalla, S. M., Jafer, M., Abdelgadir, J., & De Vries, N. (2019). Child labour and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labour on children’s health in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Public Health, 41(1), 18-26.
  16. Kutsyuruba, B., Klinger, D. A., & Hussain, A. (2015). Relationships among school climate, school safety, and student achievement and well‐being: a review of the literature. Review of Education, 3(2), 103-135.
  17. Labour exploitation - Action against Trafficking in Human Beings - www.coe.int. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking/labour-exploitation
  18. Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 125-137.
  19. Mourtada, R., Schlecht, J., & DeJong, J. (2017). A qualitative study exploring child marriage practices among Syrian conflict-affected populations in Lebanon. Conflict and health, 11, 53-65.
  20. Muller, C. (2018). Parent involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of family resources available to the child. In Parents, their children, and schools (pp. 77-114). Routledge.
  21. Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviours, and academic achievement: differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and learning, 10, 375-406.
  22. Oliver, R., Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2017). Children working it out together: A comparison of younger and older learners collaborating in task-based interaction. System, 69, 1-14.
  23. Peterman, A., Potts, A., O’Donnell, M., Thompson, K., Shah, N., Oertelt-Prigione, S., & Van Gelder, N. (2020). Pandemics and violence against women and children (Vol. 528, pp. 1-45). Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.
  24. Radfar, A., Asgharzadeh, S. a. A., Quesada, F., & Filip, I. (2018). Challenges and perspectives of child labour. Industrial Psychiatry Journal/Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 27(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_105_14
  25. Reich, J. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can’t transform education. Harvard University Press.
  26. Research guides: Domestic Labour and Home Economics: Domestic Labour. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://guides.library.harvard.edu/schlesinger/domesticlabor_homeeconomics/domesticlabor.
  27. Rosen, M. L., Hagen, M. P., Lurie, L. A., Miles, Z. E., Sheridan, M. A., Meltzoff, A. N., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2020). Cognitive stimulation as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status with executive function: A longitudinal investigation. Child development, 91(4), e762-e779.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic