Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 47 no. 6 (2025)

Timely Feedback through Technology-Based Assessment: Its Effectiveness on Student Performance in Algebraic Expressions

Christian Avenir | Rheagin Gumban | Kezia Marie Lego | Ledylee Luceño | Michael Luna

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Difficulties in understanding algebraic expressions can negatively impact students' efficacy, motivation, and attitude toward mathematics, highlighting the importance of addressing these challenges early. Feedback requires a significant amount of time for teachers, who often manage numerous responsibilities. However, leveraging digital tools may provide targeted and timely feedback for students, reinforcing their learning. Recognizing this significant role of timely feedback in mathematics learning, this classroom-based action research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of timely, technology-enhanced feedback using Quizizz™ in supporting struggling learners. Six purposively selected Grade 10 students, identified as poor performers in algebraic expressions, participated in the intervention. Permissions were secured from the school, the math teacher, the participants, and their parents prior to the intervention being conducted. During the intervention, weekly lessons were followed by formative assessments through the mobile application. Results in the pre-test and post-test scores, Quizizz performance metrics, and formative assessments demonstrated improvement in students' performance, particularly in the multiplication and division of algebraic expressions. Qualitative data from interviews and classroom observations revealed the positive impact of timely feedback on students' learning experiences. The findings underscore the potential of technology-based feedback tools to enhance mathematics learning, offering critical support for struggling learners when integrated with appropriate educational practices.



References:

  1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
  2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575.
  3. Bone, E., Bouck, E., & Witmer, S. (2021). Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Literature on Algebra Instruction and Interventions for Students With Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 19(1), 1-22.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  5. Brownlie, N., Burke, K., & van der Laan, L. (2024). Quality indicators of effective teacher-created summative assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 30-45.
  6. Cain, T. (2011). Teachers' classroom‐based action research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(1), 3-16.
  7. Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86.
  8. Ginovart, M. (2021). Creating Moodle quizzes for the subjects of mathematics and statistics corresponding to the first years in engineering studies. Journal Basic of Education, 4(2), 11–23.
  9. Gurganus, S. P. (2021). Math instruction for students with learning difficulties. Routledge.Wulandari, E. (2022). Quizizz application for English online learning: The students' perception. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (PAJAR), 6(3), 640–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v6i3.8774
  10. Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & Von Korflesch, H. F. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in human behavior, 125, 106963.
  11. Mahmud, M. S., & Law, M. L. (2022). Mathematics teachers' perceptions on the implementation of the Quizizz application. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(4), 134–149.
  12. Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students' text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199.
  13. Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.
  14. Naseem, A. (2021). Effect of Quizzes on Anxiety and Performance in Mathematics at Middle Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 43(1), 59-75.
  15. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). What is purposive sampling?: Definition & examples. Scribd. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/
  16. Palinkas, L. A., Fuentes, D., Finno, M., Garcia, A. R., Holloway, I. W., & Chamberlain, P. (2012). Inter-organizational collaboration in the implementation of evidence-based practices among public agencies serving abused and neglected youth. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0437-5
  17. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2202510M/Qualitative_evaluation_and_research_methods
  18. Pittalis, M. (2023). Young students' arithmetic-algebraic structure sense: An empirical model and profiles of students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(6), 1865-1887.
  19. Ponce, O. A., Galan, J. G., Pagán-Maldonado, N., & Encarnación, A. L. C. (2022). Introduction to the Philosophy of Educational Research. CRC Press. http://books.google.ie/books?id=pfiGEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT147&dq=ponce+international+journal+of+educational+excellence&hl=
  20. Setiyani, S., Fitriyani, N., & Sagita, L. (2020). Improving student's mathematical problem-solving skills through Quizizz. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(3), 276–288.
  21. Varsavsky, C. (2019). Can online weekly quizzes contribute to learning in mathematics? Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 3(2), 55–68.
  22. Veale, A. J., & Craig, T. S. (2022). Design principles for final answer assessment in linear algebra: implications for digital testing. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(4), 280-291.
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  24. Yanuarto, W., & Hastanasyah, P. (2022).Gamification: Quizizz in mathematical game learning for secondary students. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic