Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 49 no. 4 (2025)

The Ecological Critical Language Awareness of College Students in Region XI: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study

Catherine De Loyola | Gloria P. Gempes

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This convergent mixed-methods study examined Ecological Critical Language Awareness (ECLA) among Bachelor of Secondary Education in English (BSED-English) college students in Region XI. Adapted survey questionnaires were employed in the quantitative phase, while an interview guide was utilized in the qualitative phase of this study. The quantitative strand involved 300 BSED-English major college students selected from five public and five private higher education institutions in the region. Additionally, 20 participants took part in the qualitative strand through in-depth interviews, while 14 participants were engaged in two separate focus group discussions. Quantitative data analysis employed statistical tools such as Mean, Standard Deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, and inferential statistics. Results showed a high level of ELCA among students. No significant differences were found in ELCA levels when analyzed by year level, student type, sex, and age. The qualitative phase employed thematic analysis and a priori coding, confirming the six ECLA indicators: Power of Language, Anthropocentrism, Awareness of Global Environmental Issues, Ecolinguistics, Responsibility toward our Language, and Responsibility toward our Actions. The qualitative findings aligned with the quantitative results, affirming a high ELCA level; however, the results also highlight the need to bridge the gap between theory and practice. The nature of integration reflects a merging, confirmation, and expansion of quantitative and qualitative results. The study proposed an intervention program, an ECLA Micro-Credential, to address the need for pedagogical interventions.



References:

  1. Abdulkader, M., H., O., Loiy, H., Qutaish, A. (2023). Teaching Ecological Awareness Through Literature: A Case Study of Ghassan Kanafani’s Returning to Haifa.   doi: 10.56961/mejlls.v1i1.336
  2. Alexander, A. P. (2019). Lincoln and Guba's quality criteria for trustworthiness. IDC International Journal. Retrieved from IDC International Journal.
  3. Alexandra, Knight, Catherine, Allan. (2021). Intentional Ecology: Integrating environmental expertise through a focus on values, care and advocacy. Palgrave Communications,  doi: 10.1057/S41599-021-00960-1
  4. Almut, K. (2022). Critical Language Awareness and Business Communication.   doi: 10.1017/9781108696159.012
  5. Anang, S. (2022). Raising Critical Language Awareness through Language Teaching: The Indonesian Context.   doi: 10.9734/bpi/crlle/v3/1733a
  6. André, P., Calitz, M., Cullen, F., Odendaal. (2020). Creating Environmental Awareness using an Eco-Feedback Application at a Higher Education Institution. The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education,  doi: 10.4314/SAJEE.V36I1.8
  7. Anna, Strumińska-Doktór. (2016). Rola działań proekologicznych w kształtowaniu świadomości ekologicznej.   doi: 10.21697/FP.2016.2.29
  8. Annalise, W., Elaine, D. (2022). BJOG Perspectives – qualitative research: analysing data and rigour.   doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17148
  9. Anthropocentrism: Construct Validity and Measurement. (2022).    doi: 10.31390/gradschool_disstheses.3589
  10. Arntsen. A., Bruce, Philp, Chiara, Paolo, Donegani. (2018). Environmental and Societal Attitudes to Working Hours in Gendered Perspective: Patterns, Preferences and Policy. Review of Political Economy,  doi: 10.1080/09538259.2018.1495352
  11. Arran, S. (2020). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by (2nd edn.).  
  12. Ayeni, A. (2014). Empirics of Standard Deviation. 10.13140/2.1.1444.6729.
  13. Bairong, Wang. (2022). Is Female a More Pro-Environmental Gender? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,  doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138002
  14. Barros del Río, M. A., & Mediavilla‐Martínez, B. (2025). English Language Teacher Education with an Eco‐Social Perspective: An Exploratory Study. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3372
  15. Bellewes, E. (2024). Ecolinguistics and Environment in Education. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350229372
  16. Binod, N. (2022). A Review on Language, Power and Agency.   doi: 10.3126/nbj.v3i1.53422
  17. Butkevich, Y. I. (2024). Methodological foundations of the formation of environmental awareness in the practice of teaching linguistic disciplines. Èkologičeskij Vestnik, 3, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.46646/2521-683x/2024-3-11-16
  18. Caisip, A. & Espinosa, K. P. (2022). Filipino Youth's Awareness of Climate Change Impacts: Basis for Program Development in Vulnerable Urban Communities. 385-395.
  19. Canagarajah, Suresh. 2020. Foreword. In Jason Goulah & John Katunich (eds.), TESOL and sustainability: English language teaching in the Anthropocene era, v–xii. London: Bloomsbury.
  20. Catherine, O. (2022). Can You Combat Environmental Racism Without Talking About Race? Language in Environmental Justice. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.17952abstract
  21. Chau, M. H. & Jacobs, G. (2021). Commentary on WHO with nonhuman animals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1-3.
  22. Chau, M. H., Zhu, C., Jacobs, G., Delante, N., Asmi, A., Ng, S., John, S., Guo, Q., & Shunmugam, K. (2022). Ecolinguistics for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of World Languages. 8. 10.1515/jwl-2021-0027.
  23. Cheraghpour Samvati, G., Maftoon, P., & Rashtchi, M. (2023). Shedding light on ecological critical language awareness construct: A questionnaire development and validation study in the Iranian EFL context. Research in English Language Pedagogy.
  24. Cheraghpour Samvati, G., Maftoon, P., & Rashtchi, M. (2024). Applying the Activity Theory Framework to Raise EFL Learners’ Ecological Critical Language Awareness. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research.
  25. Chittaranjan, A. (2020). Sample size and its importance in research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine,  doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_504_19
  26. Coralde, L. (2019). Filipino students' communication performance: Challenging established variables and recognizing impacts of ICT. Academia.edu.Retrieved from Academia.edu
  27. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. 11.
  28. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  30. Crina-Bianca, Frăţilă. (2022). On the Power of Language in Military Leadership. Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre,  doi: 10.2478/raft-2022-0015
  31. Crookes, Graham V. 2021. Critical language pedagogy: An introduction to principles and values. ELT Journal 75(3). 247–255
  32. Cruz, J. P. & Nerissa S. Tantengco. (2017). “Students’ Environmental Awareness and Practices: Basis for Development of Advocacy Program” in MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, Vol.2(1) March, pp.43-64. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI [Indonesia University of Education] Press, ISSN 2527-3868 (print) and 2503-457X (online).
  33. Danilo, V., Rogayan., Eveyen, El, Elyonna, D., Nebrida. (2019). Environmental Awareness and Practices of Science Students: Input for Ecological Management Plan.  
  34. Darren, D. (2022). Taking Responsibility for Our Actions: Why It Is Time to Think About Stewardship.   doi: 10.1201/9781003228615-31
  35. Delavan, Michael G. 2020. Earth democracy as empowerment for TESOL students and educators:Though the crisis speaks English, englishes can become a commons language of
  36. Diwan, G., & Pandey, N. (2024). Eco-criticism: Nature and environment in literature. International Journal of Eco-Critical Studies and Environment. Retrieved from here.
  37. Dwi, N., Listya, U. (2020). The role of non-governmental organization in creating awareness of global environmental issues: discourse analysis of the 2016/2017 green school annual report.   doi: 10.35457/JARES.V5I2.1025
  38. Echavarren, J.M. The Gender Gap in Environmental Concern: Support for an Ecofeminist Perspective and the Role of Gender Egalitarian Attitudes. Sex Roles 89, 610–623 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3
  39. Edith O., Carhuaz V., Pulido Capurro Daniel, E., Yupanqui L. (2020). Conducta y actitud ambiental responsable en estudiantes universitarios en Lima, Perú.   doi: 10.17162/AU.V11I1.559
  40. Emma, R., Britton. (2021). Using Critical Language Awareness to Disrupt Global English Hegemony in US Higher Education.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-56654-8_21
  41. Engel, R. J., & Schutt, R. K. (2016). The practice of research in social work. Sage Publications.
  42. Erika, Darics. (2019). Critical Language and Discourse Awareness in Management Education. Journal of Management Education,  doi: 10.1177/1052562919848023
  43. Eromosele, O.E., & Ekholuenetale, M. (2016). On Misconceptions of Ecological Concepts among Public Senior Secondary Schools Students in Benin City, Nigeria. International journal of innovation and scientific research, 27, 109-118.
  44. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6pt2):2134–56. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
  45. Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research (2017–2020): Growth, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 5-8.
  46. Fill, Alwin. 2001. Ecolinguistics: States of the art 1998. In Alwin Fill & Peter Mühlhausler (eds.), The Ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 43–53. London: Continuum.
  47. Fortuna, P., Wróblewski, Z. & Gorbaniuk, O. The structure and correlates of anthropocentrism as a psychological construct. Curr Psychol 42, 3630–3642 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01835-z
  48. Gempes, G. P., & Obenza, B. N.  (2025). Integrating Conceptual Frameworks in Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to Design and Application. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Higher Education, 2(3), 1-12.
  49. Gerald, Van, Amburg. (2022). Anthropocentrism.   doi: 10.31219/osf.io/a2whu
  50. Gilbert C Magulod. Climate change awareness and environmental attitude of College students in one campus of a State University in the Philippines. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 12 (2), pp.211-220. ⟨hal-03544223⟩
  51. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  52. Guetterman TC, Fetters MD, Creswell JW. Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):554–61. doi:10.1370/afm.1865.
  53. Gierczyk, M., Gromkowska-Melosik, A., Scott, S., & Parker, C. (2024). The snowball sampling strategy in the field of social sciences: Contexts and considerations. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych (Educational Studies Review), 43(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2023.029
  54. Haig, E. (2006). How Green Was My Textbook? Towards an Ecological Critical Language Awareness Pedagogy.
  55. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn.
  56. Hameda, S. (2022). Raising Libyan EFL undergraduate students’ awareness about environmental issues through project-based learning. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching,  doi: 10.18844/gjflt.v12i3.6294
  57. Hameed, H. (2020). Quantitative and qualitative research methods: Considerations and issues in qualitative research. The Maldives National Journal of Research. 8. 8-17. 10.62338/pw6mmp62.
  58. Hannah, L., Sean, R., Tracy. (2022). Establishing a Relationship Between Demographic Factors and Students' Environmental Awareness. Journal of Student Research,  doi: 10.47611/jsrhs.v11i1.2282
  59. Hans, L. (2019). Responsibility for Eco-systems and problems of social traps and dilemmas.   doi: 10.25082/REE.2019.01.002
  60. Hatta, T., Narita, K., Yanagihara, K., Ishiguro, H., Murayama, T., & Yokode, M. (2020). Crossover Mixed Analysis in a Convergent Mixed Methods Design Used to Investigate Clinical Dialogues About Cancer Treatment in the Japanese Context. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818792793
  61. Haugen, Einar. 1972. The ecology of language. In Anwar S. Dil (ed.), The ecology of language: Essays by Einar Haugen, 325–339. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  62. Heba, M. (2019). Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach: Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism. International Business Research,  doi: 10.5539/IBR.V12N9P1
  63. Helen, K. (2019). Anthropocentrism and Post-Humanism.   doi: 10.1002/9781118924396.WBIEA2387
  64. Henriëtte, Loubser. (2019). Die ekoteks in die klaskamer.  
  65. Herman, H., Ridwin, Purba., Amrin, S. (2022). Lexical Items of Flora and Fauna in Local Languages: An Ecolinguistics Study.   doi: 10.56854/jsshr.v1i1.49
  66. Hermine, Penz., Alwin, Fill. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of world languages,  doi: 10.1515/jwl-2022-0008
  67. Hibbert, L. (2019). Critical language awareness as decolonising tool for a unifying ecology in teacher education in South Africa. Journal for Language Teaching. 52. 78. 10.4314/jlt.v52i2.4.
  68. I., Irma., Marlina. (2022). Partisipasi perempuan dalam pengelolaan lingkungan. UNM Environmental Journals,  doi: 10.26858/uej.v5i2.42831
  69. Iliyasu, R., & Etikan, I. (2021). Comparison of quota sampling and stratified random sampling. International Journal of Biometrics. Volume 10. 24-27. 10.15406/bbij.2021.10.00326.
  70. Irina, V. (2020). Ecological Properties of Speech in the Communicative Field of Russian As a Foreign Language: New Extension. KnE Social Sciences,  doi: 10.18502/KSS.V4I2.6316
  71. Iryna, S., Melnyk., V.H., Podorozhnyi. (2023). Factors of environmental awareness formation in students.   doi: 10.31652/2786-6033-2023-1(3)-5-9
  72. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
  73. Jabal, Nur, ,, Guswan, Hakim, ,, Muhammad, Gazali, Husen, ,, Ruliah, and, Siti, Misnar, Abdul, Jalil. (2022). Anthropocentrism and Providentialism.   doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192864369.003.0005
  74. Jahangir, J., Alireza, Z. (2016). The Relationship between Value Orientation and Attitudes toward the Environment Case Study: Shiraz University Students. International journal of humanities and social sciences, 
  75. Jean-Etienne, J., Anthony, M., Gould, Robert, Spillane, Sylvain, Luc. (2021). The language of power and authority in leadership. Leadership Quarterly,  doi: 10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2020.101491
  76. Johnson, M., & Lee, H. (2020). Age as an affective factor in second language acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 567-589. doi:10.1080/23456789.2019.2345678
  77. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2020). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 112-133.
  78. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  79. Joshua, R., Castillo. (2023). The Power of Language and the Language of Power: Sociolinguistic Methods and Social Histories of Language and Political Power in Mobutu’s Congo-Zaire (1965–1997). History in Africa,  doi: 10.1017/hia.2022.13
  80. Juup, Stelma., Richard, Fay. (2019). An Ecological Perspective for Critical Action in Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17057-8_4
  81. K., David, Harrison. (2022). Environmental Linguistics. Annual review of linguistics,  doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-013152
  82. K., G., Frolov. (2022). Identification of Actions as a Factor in Attributing Moral Responsibility. Ètičeskaâ myslʹ,  doi: 10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-2-34-47
  83. Kamran, A. S. (2013). Heuristics for Sample Size Determination in Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Social Science Research Network, 
  84. Kazazoglu, S. (2025). Environmental education through eco-literacy: Integrating sustainability into English language teaching. Sustainability, 17(5), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052156
  85. Kelly S. (2010) Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  86. Kenny, S. (2022). How Language Learning and Language Use Create Linguistic Structure. Current Directions in Psychological Science,  doi: 10.1177/09637214211068127
  87. Kusumawati, H., & Alatas, M. A. (2024). Penerapan Kontruksi Ekologis dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia pada Siswa di MA Ummul Quro Putri Pamekasan. Ghancaran. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.17777
  88. Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  89. L, Forni. (2023). The language of power and the power of language. Analysis of propaganda’s narrative in Fahrenheit 451. SN Social Sciences,  doi: 10.1007/s43545-023-00675-x
  90. Ladegaard, Hans J. & Alison Phipps. 2020. Epilogue: Notes towards a socially engaged LAIC. Language and Intercultural Communication 20(2). 218–219.
  91. Laura, M., Nihat, P., Carla, K., Meyer. (2022). Critical language awareness in teacher education: an experiment at the intersection of language, identity, and ideologies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,  doi: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2160727
  92. Laura, S., Jenanne, F. (2020). Responsibility and Language Practices in Place.  
  93. Laÿna, D. (2020). Environmental Individual Responsibility for Accumulated Consequences. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics,  doi: 10.1007/S10806-019-09816-W
  94. Liesel, H. (2019). Critical language awareness as decolonising tool for a unifying ecology in teacher education in South Africa.   doi: 10.4314/JLT.V52I2.4
  95. Lindita, Tahiri., Nuran, Muhaxheri. (2020). Stylistics as a tool for critical language awareness. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies,  doi: 10.17263/JLLS.850989
  96. Love, H & Cook, B & Cook, L. (2022). Mixed‐Methods Approaches in Special Education Research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 37. 10.1111/ldrp.12295.
  97. Lualhati,  G.  P.(2019). Environmental  awareness  and  participation  of  Filipino  pre-service  teachers.JPBI  (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2),345-352.doi:https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8524
  98. Maha, Salah, ElDien, Mohamed, Hamed. (2021). Environmental Discourse in EFL Textbooks in Egypt: A Critical Ecolinguistics Case Study.   doi: 10.21608/OPDE.2021.195338
  99. Mahshid, N. (2019). Language as a sign of power in the handmaidʼs tale. Epiphany,  doi: 10.21533/EPIPHANY.V12I1.259
  100. Mandira, G., Almas, P. (2020). Development of environmental awareness through education: Problems and Solutions. Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research
  101. Marco, A., Micalay-Hurtado, R., Edward, Poole. (2022). Eco-critical language awareness for English language teaching (ELT): Promoting justice, wellbeing, and sustainability in the classroom. Journal of world languages,  doi: 10.1515/jwl-2022-0023
  102. Maria, V., Romeo, S., Sgarlata. (2020). Anthropocentrism and Speciesism in the Context of Environmental Studies. A Synoptic Introduction.   doi: 10.14746/EIP.2020.2.1
  103. Mark, O., Ikeke. (2021). The (Mis) Use of Language in Nigerian Political Campaigns (NPC): Moral Philosophical Perspectives.   doi: 10.37284/EAJASS.3.1.260
  104. Martinez, L. (2020). The impact of age on using language learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 301-322. doi:10.1017/S0272263120005678
  105. Mary, H., Henderson. (2022). Critical Language Awareness in the Spanish as a Heritage Language College Classroom. Languages,  doi: 10.3390/languages7030157
  106. Matthew, D., Adams. (2023). Anthropocentrism, animism and the Anthropocene: decentring the human in psychology. British Gestalt journal,  doi: 10.53667/ewmn9173
  107. McMillan, J. & Schumacher, S. (2014) Research in Education. Evidence-Based Inquiry. 
  108. Meng, H., Chau., Chenghao, Zhu., George, M., Jacobs., Nimrod, Delante., Alfian, Asmi., Serena, Ng., Sharon, Santhia, John., Qi, Guo., Krishnavanie, Shunmugam. (2022). Ecolinguistics for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of world languages,  doi: 10.1515/jwl-2021-0027
  109. Meniado, J. (2019). Demographic variables and English proficiency of adult language learners: A correlational study. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(1), 38-54. doi:10.31014/aior.1993.02.01.38
  110. Micalay-Hurtado, M. A., & Poole, R. (2022). Eco-critical language awareness for English language teaching (ELT): Promoting justice, wellbeing, and sustainability in the classroom. Journal of World Languages.
  111. Moro-egido, A. I., & Panades, J. (2010). An Analysis of Student Satisfaction: Full-Time vs. Part-Time Students. Social Indicators Research.
  112. Muhammad, I., Ali., Amirullah, Abduh., Rozi, Mahmud., Samirah, Dunakhir. (2023). Raising Students’ Awareness on Environmental Education Issues. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review,  doi: 10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.59146
  113. Munira, S., Hossain, A., & Nessa, M. (2020). Gender and sex-based differences in lexical directions: A study on language theories. Advances in Applied Sociology, 10(4), 93-102. doi:10.4236/aasoci.2020.104007
  114. N.B., M., E., M. (2023). The study of the formation of the ecological imperative among students of higher educational institutions. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniâ,  doi: 10.32744/pse.2023.1.3
  115. Naresh, M. (2020). Reiterating rationale use of statistical tools in research articles. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College,  doi: 10.3126/JKMC.V8I3.29712
  116. Nena, R., Klara, C. (2016). Students' Attitudes and Behaviours in the Context of Environmental Issues.   doi: 10.17234/SOCEKOL.25.1.1
  117. Neville, G. (2019). Phenomenological Research Methodology.   doi: 10.31364/SCIRJ/V7.I5.2019.P0519656
  118. Ngulube, P. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis and Interpretation: Systematic Search for Meaning. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1375.7608.
  119. O., M., Kazakova., T., N., Malinovskaia., B., A., Fedulov., E., V., Romanova., A., G., Zavgorodnii., N., S., Matveychuk. (2020). Ecological awareness of university students about UN sustainable development goals at global, national and regional levels. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology,  doi: 10.15421/2020_34
  120. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42(5): 533–544.
  121. Parsons, V. (2017). Stratified Sampling. 10.1002/9781118445112.stat05999.pub2.
  122. Partha, D. (2020). How Do Our Actions Undermine Nature.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_4
  123. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  124. Pedro, C., Cantú-Martínez. (2020). Preocupación y deterioro de la calidad ambiental. Apreciación de los estudiantes universitarios. Ambiente y Desarrollo,  doi: 10.11144/JAVERIANA.AYD24-46.PDCA
  125. Parreñas, B. A. (2020). Bridging the gap for critical eco-literacy in the Philippines through debating. The IAFOR Research Archive. https://papers.iafor.org/submission59793/
  126. Pfenninger, S. E. (2017). Not so individual after all: An ecological approach to age as an individual difference variable in a classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 19–46.
  127. Pratolo, B. W., Purwanti, E., Humanika, E. S., Bao, D., Najmi, A. H., Oktavianti, I. N., Surono, S., & Sari, D. M. (2024). Eco-Lexicons in ELT: Analyzing Environmental Narratives through Critical Discourse Analysis. BIO Web of Conferences, 148, 02035. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414802035
  128. Punzalan, C. & Signo, C. & Signo, M. Teresa & Marasigan, Arlyne. (2019). Environmental Awareness of Selected Urban and Rural High School Students in the Philippines. 10.26634/jsch . 15.2.16664.
  129. R.K., Aksholakova, Zh., Zh., Kuzembekova. (2022). Language in the ecosystem: ecolinguistics. Habaršy - A̋l-Farabi atyndag̣y K̦azak̦ memlekettik ụlttyk̦ universiteti. Filologiâ seriâsy,  doi: 10.26577/ejph.2022.v185.i1.ph3
  130. Rano, U., Madzhidova. (2022). Anthropocentrism as an important feature of modern linguistics. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities,  doi: 10.5958/2249-7315.2022.00197.6
  131. Refiloe, M., Cynthia, M. (2015). Learning for the future, earning for now : students' experiences of the work-study programme at the University of the Western Cape.  
  132. Rejitha, R., Pushpa, S. (2020). Utilizing a Data analytics project to increase student awareness of contemporary global issues.   doi: 10.1109/ASET48392.2020.9118395
  133. Robert, A., Poole. (2022). Corpus-Assisted Ecolinguistics.   doi: 10.5040/9781350138582
  134. S., O., Suniehin. (2021). Anthropocentrism as a paradigm of legal science: historical origins and modern context.   doi: 10.33663/2524-017X-2021-12-41
  135. Sahril, Nur., Ismail, Anas., Reski, Pilu. (2022). The Call for Environmentally-Based Language Teaching and Green Pedagogy: Climate Actions in Language Education.   doi: 10.31849/elsya.v4i1.9526
  136. Samuel, A., Bassey. (2019). ‘Anthropoholism’ As an Authentic Tool for Environmental Management..   doi: 10.26565/2226-0994-2019-60-8
  137. Sanna, K., Anja, N. (2023). Bad Wolves? Political Ecology of Responsibility and More-Than-Human Perspectives in Human–Wildlife Interactions. Society & Natural Resources,  doi: 10.1080/08941920.2023.2209789
  138. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 126. 1. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
  139. Silke, B., Katharina, G., Laurenz, V. (2021). Ecology, Cultural Awareness, Anti-Racism and Critical Thinking: Integrating Multiple Perspectives in Foreign Language Teaching. European journal of literature, culture and the environment,  doi: 10.37536/ECOZONA.2021.12.1.3961
  140. Simone, A., Luca, B. (2016). Responsibility and Social Action.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-11014-7_2
  141. Siti, N., Endang, S., Safnowandi, S., Fida, R., Khaeruman, K., Akhmad, S. (2022). Development of Local Potential-Based Environmental Care Instrument and its Ability to Reveal Students' Caring Attitudes at Genders and Grades. International Journal of Instruction,  doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15433a
  142. Sonny, E., Zaluchu. (2019). The Power of One Language Critical Discourse and Interaction Process Analysis of the Tower of Babel in Genesis Text 11: -9.   doi: 10.2991/PRASASTI-19.2019.46
  143. Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2023). Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Expanding Approaches for Research. Retrieved from ERIC.
  144. Suzanne, H., Ana, C., Jiwon, K., Milad, S., Tamara, Z. (2020). The power of language: Exploring the relationship between linguistic capital and occupation for immigrants to Canada. Journal of Occupational Science,  doi: 10.1080/14427591.2018.1534136
  145. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2020). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE Publications.
  146. Tejaswini, B. (2022). Study of environmental awareness in secondary school students. Scholarly research journal for interdisciplinary studies,  doi: 10.21922/srjis.v9i70.10080
  147. Terukazu, S. (2023). Pragmatic Estimation of Sample Size for Number of Interviews for PRO development in the 2009 FDA PRO guidance.   doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.04760
  148. Tim, J, Cole, D., G., A. (2017). Statistics Notes: What is a percentage difference?. BMJ,  doi: 10.1136/BMJ.J3663
  149. Tom, T. (2021). The Exception and the Norm: Dimensions of Anthropocentrism.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-39773-9_2
  150. Tuti, R. (2022). Essay on the relationship between language and the environment.   doi: 10.31219/osf.io/qakh2
  151. V., M., Sheiko, N., M., Kushnarenko. (2022). Anthropo­centrism as a methodological principle of higher education: theoretical and practical aspects. Kulʹtura Ukraïni,  doi: 10.31516/2410-5325.076.01
  152. Vera, L., Lopes, C., Bruno, P., Sanches, G., Smart. (2022). Environmental discourse in Brazilian English-as-a-foreign-language textbooks: socio-discursive practices and their implications for developing students’ critical environmental literacy. Environmental Education Research,  doi: 10.1080/13504622.2021.2007855
  153. Veryan, R. (2019). The power of language: The importance of shaping language as a constructive tool in health care.. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice,  doi: 10.1111/JEP.13172
  154. Viscarra, H. (2013). Quantitative research designs: Descriptive, correlational, and experimental. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store.
  155. Walker, J. A. (2024). Language variation and sex. In J. A. Walker (Ed.), Language in its social context (pp. 223-250). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42522-6_10
  156. Yang, G. (2022). Enhancing Critical Cultural Awareness in Foreign Language Learning Contexts Through the Critical Use of Student-Made Documentary Films. Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series,  doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5394-0.ch002
  157. Yi, L., Le, W. (2020). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,  doi: 10.1080/01434632.2019.1621126
  158. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  159. Yuliya, D. (2022). Forming ecological awareness when teaching foreign languages: sharing experience. Прикладная психология и педагогика,  doi: 10.12737/2500-0543-2022-120-133
  160. Zhaneta, A. (2022). The Responsibility to Language and to the Work of the Linguist. Bʺlgarski ezik i literatura,  doi: 10.53656/bel2022-9-za
  161. Zhanna Konovalova, Alsu A., Khafizova, Natalia, Arzhantseva. (2021). Forming of ecological awareness of the students of international relations and regional studies at the English language teaching.   doi: 10.1051/E3SCONF/202129505016
  162. Zhuoran, Y. (2022). Care as Practice and Ethic.   doi: 10.1332/policypress/9781529201215.003.0002.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic