Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2026)

Morphological Variations of the Cebuano and Hiligaynon-Visayan Languages in the Local Dailies of Negros Island

Alan D. Bautista

Discipline: others in language and area studies

 

Abstract:

The study seeks to analyze morphological variation in Cebuano and Hiligaynon as used in local newspapers and magazines on Negros Island. Employing a descriptive linguistic analysis grounded in morphological theory, the study analyzes selected articles from local dailies on Negros Island between 2017 and 2018. A significant research gap exists in the detailed morphological analysis of Cebuano-Visayan and Hiligaynon-Visayan languages within the context of Negros Island's local dailies. Although phonological, lexical, and contextual aspects have been studied, research on morphological structures— such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs—in published media remains scarce. This gap limits our understanding of how these languages function in contemporary, real-world communication. The study analyzed a corpus of 30 local newspaper articles (approx. 20,000 words) published between 2017 and 2018, sourced from NewsRecord (15 articles), Pikpik sa Abaga (10), and other regional dailies (5), with individual articles ranging from 300 to 1,200 words and selected for their language use, cultural relevance, and a 100-word minimum length. The findings show that although there is significant lexical overlap between the two languages, there are also clear morphological distinctions, particularly in word formation, stress patterns, and affixation. The study highlights that although CV and HV share similar linguistic origins, they nevertheless exhibit distinct morphological traits shaped by regional and cultural factors. These results highlight the importance of preserving regional languages and expanding our understanding of the linguistic diversity in the Philippine context. The study's implications extend beyond classroom instruction to language preservation, documentation, and promotion, all of which are integral to cultural heritage management.



References:

  1. Abelito, J. (2023). A common English phrase utilized by Ilonggo speakers and its translation into Hiligaynon: A contrastive analysis. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(8): 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10045852
  2. Abiog, E.B., & David, R. (2020). More than words: A documentation and a morphological analysis of an indigenous language in the Philippines. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1774-1783. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.850999 
  3. Anttila, A. (2002). Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014245408622
  4. Anwar, I., & Rosa, R.N. (2020). The role of morphological awareness and explicit morphological instructions in ELT. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(1), 28–37. DOI: 10.30743/ll.v4i1.1825 
  5. Arkadiev, P. (2020). Morphology in typology: Historical retrospect, state of the art, and prospects. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.626 
  6. Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2022). What is morphology?. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Arora, A., Farris, A., Basu, S., & Kolichala, S. (2022). Computational historical linguistics and language diversity in South Asia. arXiv > cs > arXiv: 2203.12524. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.12524 
  8. Badenoch, N., & Choksi, N. (2020). Expressives in the South Asian linguistic area (Vol. 13). Brill.
  9. Biray, E. (2023). Derivational morphology features in common Akeanon dialects. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(4), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i4.1441
  10. Bhatia, T., & Ritchie, W. (1998). The bilingual child: Some issues and perspectives. In Handbook of Child Language Acquisition (pp. 569–643). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653023_020 
  11. Co-Tortogo, L.M., Samson-Caraballe, M.R., & Montalvo-Pedrosa, E. (2021). Hiligaynon-Visayan gays' spoken discourse: A morphological analysis. Globus Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2), 73–81. 
  12. Fishman, J. (1980). Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societal phenomena. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 1(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1980.9993995
  13. Fontillas, L.R., & Bantugan, R.M. (2024). Morphological and lexical variations of Tagalog nominal and pronominal systems in Bataan: Basis for the development of an aggregate of discrete Tagalog nouns and pronouns spoken by Bataeños. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(8), 144-172. 10.4236/jss.2024.128011
  14. Fortes, A.C. (2022). Morphological paradigm of nouns and verbs: Meaning and functions in Bisakol, a Philippine-type language. In Proceedings of the 36th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 234–242).
  15. Fukazawa, H., Kitahara, M., & Ota, M. (1998). Lexical stratification and ranking invariance in constraint-based grammars. CLS, 34(2), 47–62.
  16. Greenberg, J. (2002). Essays in linguistics. University of Chicago Press.
  17. Gwilliams, L. (2020). How the brain composes morphemes into meaning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1791). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0311 
  18. Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S.J. Keyser [eds.], The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 111–176.
  19. Harley, H., & Noyer, R. (1999). Distributed morphology. Glot International, 4(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110890952.463  
  20. Heath, J. (1998). Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affect substitution. Language, 728–759.
  21. Imran, M., Sarwat, S., & Rehman, M. (2023). A study of morpheme intervention for classroom teaching and its impacts on students’ vocabulary. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-I)01
  22. Itô, J., & Mester, A. (2001). Covert generalizations in Optimality Theory: The role of stratal faithfulness constraints. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, 7(2), 273-299. 
  23. Kurbanova, M.M., & Ataeva, G.B. (2020). Linguistic methods for investigating concepts in use. European Scholar Journal, 1(1), 27–30.
  24. Levesque, K., Breadmore, H., & Deacon, S.H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313 
  25. Lieber, R. (2021). Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Meurers, D. (2020). Natural language processing and language learning. Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://tinyurl.com/yrze2nnj
  27. Parker, F., & Riley, K. (1994). Linguistics for non-linguistics. Allen and Bacon.
  28. Penera, L.K. (2021). Morphosyntax variations of the" Surigaonon" language in North-Eastern," Mindanao," Philippines. TESOL International Journal, 16(2), 122–147. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1329702.pdf 
  29. Perez, J.C. (2021). Derivational morphemes in Guihulngan-Visayan. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(7), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.7.6 
  30. Piloton, E., Rodriguez, G., & Garcia, N. (2024). An analysis of the morphological structure of degree of comparison in Blaan language. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(7), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11154890
  31. Sales, A.J. (2022). Language interference and generative phonology in speech production among Hiligaynon native speakers. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(3), 262-275. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i3.7558 
  32. San Jose, D.B., & Pilar, J.G. (2023). Phonological idiosyncrasies of the Southern Sorsogon dialect in Bulan, Philippines. Rupkatha Journal, 15(3), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n3.05
  33. Schiller, N. (2020). Neurolinguistic approaches in morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.601 
  34. Shamsieva, M.B. (2021). An empirical study of the speech development of children in conditions of bilingualism. Theoretical & Applied Science, (8), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.08.100.50 
  35. Sukying, A. (2020). Word knowledge through morphological awareness in EFL learners. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 74–85. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1257212
  36. Valentini, A., & Serratrice, L. (2021). What can bilingual children tell us about the developmental relationship between vocabulary and grammar?. Cognitive Science, 45(11), e13062.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13062 
  37. Williams, J. (2020). Expressive morphology in the languages ​​of South Asia. Taylor & Francis.
  38. Yadav, M.K., & Yadav, M.S. (2021). A theoretical overview on the impacts and strategies of morphology in English language teaching to the L2 learners. International Journal of Research, 8(3), 311–331.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic