Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 3 no. 3 (2025)

Epekto ng Pagbibigay at Pagtanggap ng Peer Feedback sa Pagkatuto at Pagsulat ng mga Mag-aaral sa Medyor sa Filipino

Ronnie P. Osico | Stephanie C. Pablo | Nathaniel P. Osico

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Layunin ng pananaliksik na ito na alamin ang ugnayan sa pagitan ng antas sa epekto ng pagbibigay at pagtanggap ng peer feedback sa pagsulat at pagkatuto ng mga kalahokl mula BSED Filipino mula una hanggang ikaapat na taon. Ginamit sa pag-aaral na ito ay ang kwantitatibong disenyo ng pananaliksik na gumagamit ng deskriptibong korelasyunal na teknik upang tukuyin ang mga kakayahang pangkomunikatibo at ng kasanayang sosyal ng mga mag-aaral sa lahat ng programa sa Kapalong College of Agriculture, Sciences and Technology. Ang pamamaraang ito ay ginamit upang kalkulahin at suriin ang mga baryabol upang makapagtala ng mga resulta. Ang pamamaraang ito ay tinukoy bilang ang proseso ng paglalarawan ng isang problema o penomena sa pagkolekta ng numerikong datos upang kunin gamit ang mga instrumentong matematikal, partikular na ang istatistika (Apuke, 2022). Ang pangkalahatang kabouang marka ng antas ng pagbibigay at pagtanggap ng peer feedback ay 4.21 at ang pagkatuto at pagsulat ay 4.01. Ang dalawang baryabol ay may kabuoang 0.693 r-value na palatandaan at dahil yung antas ng posibilidad na 0.001 ay mas mababa kaysa sa antas ng kahalagahan na 0.693. Samakatuwid, ang null hypothesis na nagsasaad na walang makabuluhang ugnayan sa pagitan ng antas ng pagbibigay at pagtanggap ng peer feedback sa pagkatuto at pagsulat ng mga mag-aaral sa medyor sa Filipino sa Kapalong College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology. Ayon sa resulta ng pag-aaral, ang respondente mula sa mga mag-aaral ng BSED Filipino sa unang taon hanggang sa ikaapat na taon ay may mataas na antas sa kalidad ng feedback, kapitagan ng feedback, pagtanggap ng feedback bilang mga palatandaan ng pagbibigay at pagtanggap ng peer feedback Pagdating sa kanilang pagkatuto at pagsulat, lahat ng mga palatandaan na ito ay makakuha rin ng parehong resulta na mataas. Nangangahulugan lamang na ang kalidad ng nilalaman, kakayahang makipagtulungan, at kritikal na pag-iisip ng mag-aaral ng unang taon hanggang ikaapat na taon sa kursong BSED Filipino sa Kapalong College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology ay isinasabuhay nila upang makapagbigay sila ng feedback na naaayon sa iba.



References:

  1. Author. (2024). Descriptive-correlational design in research. Author. https://author.com/essay-examples/descriptive-correlational-design-in-research
  2. Barris, M. (2022). Vygotsky the teacher: A companion to his psychology for teachers and other practitioners. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/135625100114885
  4. Educaring. (2023). Lev Vygotsky: How relationships shape learning. RIE. https://rie.org/lev-vygotsky-how-relationships-shape-our-lear/#:~:text=Vygotsky%20saw%20learning%20as%20an,and%20comments%20on%20this%20discovery
  5. Gao, Y., & He, W. (2023). Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 10382203. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382203/
  6. Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2022). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
  7. Ilham, I. (2022). Exploring students' learning needs of academic writing skill as the base to design the learning materials. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(1), 21–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368367791_Exploring_Students'_Learning_Needs_of_Academic_Writing_Skill_as_the_Base_to_Design_the_Learning_Materials
  8. Jug, R., Jiang, X., & Bean, S. (2020). Giving and receiving effective feedback: A review article and how-to guide. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 143(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.5858/ara.2018-0058-RA
  9. Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Chang, S. C., & Hsu, Y. D. (2021). Facilitating critical thinking in decision-making-based professional training. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09938-9
  10. Meziani, L., & Fraga, S. (2023). Promoting learners’ critical thinking through self and peer feedback [Master’s thesis, Université de Guelma]. Université de Guelma Repository. https://dspace.univ-guelma.dz/xmlui/handle/123456789/15600
  11. Pella, T., Rotger, N., & Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1883-1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
  12. Ramos, J. (2020). Writing classes at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela: The effectiveness of utilizing peer feedback in technical writing classes. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341110809
  13. Schartel, S. A. (2020). Giving feedback—An integral part of education. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 26(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003
  14. Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2020). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students' perspectives. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
  15. Scribbr. (2022). Quantitative research: Definition, uses, and methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/
    Springer Nature. (2020). Peer feedback improves students' academic self-concept in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 62(6), 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y
  16. Stankic, D. P. (2021). Peer feedback as a collaborative task used in improving writing skills: A case study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 35-41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323669580
  17. Tan, J., & Chen, W. (2022). Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward? Computers & Education, 181, 104452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104452
  18. Tasdemir, M., & Arslan, F. (2023). Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning style. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1481560. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1481560
  19. University of Oxford. (2024). Peer feedback. University of Oxford. https://www.ctl.ox.ac.uk/peer-feedback
  20. University of Waterloo. (2024). Receiving and giving effective feedback. University of Waterloo. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/catalogs/tip-sheets/receiving-and-giving-effective-feedback
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press. http://www.cles.mlc.edu.tw/-centcu/099-curriculum/EduPsy/EP03New.pdf
  22. Wu, Y. (2022). The effects of providing peer feedback on learners' genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 975183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9751833/
  23. Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. Frontiers in Education, 6, 711245. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294485.pdf

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic