HomeInternational Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studiesvol. 1 no. 1 (2025)

S.P.E.A.K. (Speech Performance, Engagement, Articulation, and Knowledge): An Intervention to Enhance Oral Communication Skills among Senior High School Students

Maria Rizalie Lindo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the experiences and perceptions of Grade 11 students who participated in the S.P.E.A.K. intervention, a program designed to enhance oral communication skills. Using a descriptive phenomenological approach, ten students were interviewed through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Findings revealed that students overcame anxiety, gained confidence, felt motivated through interactive learning, and experienced a supportive environment. The most effective components were regular speaking practice that improved fluency, engagement activities that encouraged real-world communication, and articulation exercises that strengthened speech clarity. Despite these benefits, students identified limitations such as limited impromptu speaking opportunities, need for extended practice, desire for individualized feedback, uneven emphasis on components, and time constraints. These results suggest that while the S.P.E.A.K. intervention effectively enhances speaking skills and confidence, improvements such as more spontaneous speaking, personalized guidance, balanced activities, and longer practice sessions could increase its effectiveness.



References:

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://archive.org/details/socialfoundation0000band
  2. Basher, N. N., Hong, L. J., Abdullah, N. S., Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., & Sunandar, A. (2025). Empowering communication: A conceptual exploration of communicative language teaching. Pena International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communication, 1(1), 10–28. https://penacendekia.com.my/index.php/pijmjmc/article/view/33
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf
  6. DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Routledge. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=410472
  7. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin. https://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sgramley/Hymes-2.pdf
  8. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
  9. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805212/81546/excerpt/9780521281546_excerpt.pdf
  10. Pregoner, J. D., Leopardas, R., Marzado, D., Retherford, K., Ganancial, I. J., & Sedo, F. (2024). Indigenous storytelling practices and communicative competence of urban learners from Philippine ethnolinguistic groups. IMCC Journal of Education, 4(2), 1–8. https://myjournal.imcc.edu.ph/publication/volume-4-issue-2-2024/indigenous-storytelling-practicesand-communicative-competence-of-urban-learners-from-philippine-ethnolinguistic-groups/
  11. Retherford, K., Leopardas, R., Marzado, D., Pregoner, J. D., Ganancial, I. J., & Sedo, F. (2025). MICRO intervention for developing macro skills of students from non-formal education settings. IMCC Journal of Science, 5(1), 24–30. https://myjournal.imcc.edu.ph/publication/volume-5-issue-1-2025/retherford-et-al-june-2025/
  12. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  13. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED262624
  14. Tang, K. N. (2019). Beyond employability: Embedding soft skills in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 1–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1211098
  15. Thompson, J. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on complex communication. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED607786
  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf
  17. Wang, C., & Sun, T. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 95, 102366. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X20307260
  18. Zega, Y. S. (2025). Effective strategies for enhancing English speaking competence among learners in English education study programs. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(2), 88–100. https://ojs.ptmjb.com/index.php/JESCS/article/view/27