S.P.E.A.K. (Speech Performance, Engagement, Articulation, and Knowledge): An Intervention to Enhance Oral Communication Skills among Senior High School Students
Maria Rizalie Lindo
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study explored the experiences and perceptions of
Grade 11 students who participated in the S.P.E.A.K.
intervention, a program designed to enhance oral
communication skills. Using a descriptive
phenomenological approach, ten students were
interviewed through focus group discussions and in-depth
interviews. Findings revealed that students overcame
anxiety, gained confidence, felt motivated through
interactive learning, and experienced a supportive
environment. The most effective components were regular
speaking practice that improved fluency, engagement
activities that encouraged real-world communication, and
articulation exercises that strengthened speech clarity.
Despite these benefits, students identified limitations such
as limited impromptu speaking opportunities, need for
extended practice, desire for individualized feedback,
uneven emphasis on components, and time constraints.
These results suggest that while the S.P.E.A.K.
intervention effectively enhances speaking skills and
confidence, improvements such as more spontaneous
speaking, personalized guidance, balanced activities, and
longer practice sessions could increase its effectiveness.
References:
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://archive.org/details/socialfoundation0000band
- Basher, N. N., Hong, L. J., Abdullah, N. S., Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., & Sunandar, A. (2025). Empowering communication: A conceptual exploration of communicative language teaching. Pena International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communication, 1(1), 10–28. https://penacendekia.com.my/index.php/pijmjmc/article/view/33
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf
- DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Routledge. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=410472
- Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin. https://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sgramley/Hymes-2.pdf
- Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
- Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805212/81546/excerpt/9780521281546_excerpt.pdf
- Pregoner, J. D., Leopardas, R., Marzado, D., Retherford, K., Ganancial, I. J., & Sedo, F. (2024). Indigenous storytelling practices and communicative competence of urban learners from Philippine ethnolinguistic groups. IMCC Journal of Education, 4(2), 1–8. https://myjournal.imcc.edu.ph/publication/volume-4-issue-2-2024/indigenous-storytelling-practicesand-communicative-competence-of-urban-learners-from-philippine-ethnolinguistic-groups/
- Retherford, K., Leopardas, R., Marzado, D., Pregoner, J. D., Ganancial, I. J., & Sedo, F. (2025). MICRO intervention for developing macro skills of students from non-formal education settings. IMCC Journal of Science, 5(1), 24–30. https://myjournal.imcc.edu.ph/publication/volume-5-issue-1-2025/retherford-et-al-june-2025/
- Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
- Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED262624
- Tang, K. N. (2019). Beyond employability: Embedding soft skills in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 1–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1211098
- Thompson, J. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on complex communication. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED607786
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf
- Wang, C., & Sun, T. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 95, 102366. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X20307260
- Zega, Y. S. (2025). Effective strategies for enhancing English speaking competence among learners in English education study programs. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(2), 88–100. https://ojs.ptmjb.com/index.php/JESCS/article/view/27
ISSN 3116-3017 (Online)
ISSN 3116-3009 (Print)