Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 1 no. 1 (2025)

An Error Analysis of ESL College Students’ Research Abstracts in Academic Writing

Marnelle Baguhin

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the linguistic challenges encountered by college students in writing research abstracts in English, focusing on mechanical, omission, addition, substitution, and permutation errors. A quantitative error analysis was conducted on 100 research abstracts from students across various academic disciplines. Findings revealed that mechanical errors were most frequent, particularly in punctuation, followed by capitalization and spelling. Syntactic omissions were the most common omission errors, while lexical additions dominated addition errors. Substitution errors were primarily lexical, and permutation errors occurred mostly at the syntactic level. These results indicate that students struggle predominantly with sentence structure, appropriate word choice, and grammatical accuracy, which affect the clarity and academic tone of their abstracts. The study suggests the need for targeted interventions such as task-based writing activities, explicit corrective feedback, and guided practice to enhance the academic writing proficiency of ESL learners.



References:

  1. Ahamed, D. F., & Othman, D. H. (2019). Analysis and assessment of lexical errors committed by Saudi EFL university students in descriptive essay writing: A case study of College of Science & Arts-Tanumah, King Khalid University. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 7(6), 1–26. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fawzi-Eltayeb-Ahmed/publication/337363073_Analysis_and_Assessment_of_Lexical_Errors_Committed_by_Saudi_EFL_University_Students_in_Descriptive_Essay_Writing_A_Case_Study_of_College_of_Science_Arts-_Tanumah_King_Khalid_University/links/638d9ab5ca2e4b239c8d3a5a/Analysis-and-Assessment-of-Lexical-Errors-Committed-by-Saudi-EFL-University-Students-in-Descriptive-Essay-Writing-A-Case-Study-of-College-of-Science-Arts-Tanumah-King-Khalid-University.pdf
  2. Alonzo, J., & Leah, G. A. O. R. (2025). Sentence error analysis in the writings of first-year tertiary students. Linguarum Universe, 2(2), 150–159. https://ojs.linguarumuniverse.eu/index.php/jlu/article/view/54
  3. Ariffin, K., Darus, N. A., Abdul Halim, N., & Awang, N. A. (2021). Analysing morphological errors in ESL graduating students’ writing based on surface structure taxonomy. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 42–53. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/6123/
  4. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
  5. Demir, C. (2019). Writing intelligible English prose: Conciseness vs. verbosity. Söylem Filoloji Dergisi, 4(2), 482–505. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/soylemdergi/issue/51290/617184
  6. Dong, N. M. T., & Nguyen, B. T. T. (2024). Use of the inflectional morpheme –s marking plurality and the third-person singular present tense in Vietnamese EFL opinion essays: Accuracy analysis and learner perspectives. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 21(1). https://eflt.nus.edu.sg/v21n12024/dong.pdf
  7. Education First. (2022). EF English Proficiency Index 2022: A ranking of 111 countries and regions by English skills. EF Education First. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/
  8. Handayani, H. T. (2021). Error analysis of students’ spelling, capitalization, and punctuation marks in writing descriptive text encountered at Lintasan Imajinasi Bahasa Mahasiswa (LIBAM) of IAIN Parepare (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Parepare). http://repository.iainpare.ac.id/id/eprint/2740/
  9. Isakova, M. (2025). Issues of grammar: Morphology and syntax. Nordic_Press, 8(0008). https://research.nordicuniversity.org/index.php/nordic/article/view/2247
  10. Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N. G., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2577–2638. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x
  11. Koh, P. W., Tan, S. H., & Lim, C. P. (2018). Using task-based learning to enhance writing proficiency among ESL learners. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 6(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v6i2.5575
  12. Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2019). Challenges in academic writing among Chinese university students: An analysis of abstracts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1003.17
  13. Morales Yaguarshungo, C. A. (2025). Syntactic error patterns in writing compositions of EFL students (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi). https://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/items/b11027f5-5edd-41ad-ae0b-c1de9ebe14d8
  14. Munasikin, M. (2025). Analysis of syntactical errors made by EFL students in writing descriptive text. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 6886–6897. http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/17529
  15. Ndlovu, L. (2024). Punctuation errors committed in creative writing by Xitsonga grade 10 learners: The case at Mafemani Circuit, Bohlabela District, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. http://ul.netd.ac.za/handle/10386/5034
  16. Peng, J., Wang, C., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Language Teaching Research, 24(3), 364–381. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362168818783341
  17. Philippine Business for Education. (2020). Higher education in the Philippines: Challenges and opportunities. PBEd. https://www.pbed.ph/publications
  18. Rahmanian, S., & Kuperman, V. (2019). Spelling errors impede recognition of correctly spelled word forms. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 24–36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10888438.2017.1359274
  19. Sidabutar, U. (2021). An analysis of lexical cohesion on the students’ writing. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 2(2), 62–67. https://jurnal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/jetal/article/view/533
  20. Sundari, H. (2019). Task-based language teaching in EFL classrooms: Fostering effective writing performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20207
  21. Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2020). An error analysis of research abstracts written by ESL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p78

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic