Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 4 (2026)

Tuber Yield of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) as Affected by Different Frequencies of Hydroponic Waste Nutrient Solution Application

Justine Gabriel H. Coronel | Maybelyn P. Dumlao | Reinz E. Grimaldo | Joyce Ann C. Revasto | Ronel S. De Guzman

Discipline: agricultural sciences

 

Abstract:

In this study, the tuber yield of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was explored under lahar-laden soil conditions treated with hydroponic waste nutrient solution at a different frequency. The experiment was arranged in a ran- domized complete block design (RCBD) with 4 treatments and 3 replica- tions at Lahar-laden Technology Demonstration Area, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, San Marcelino Zambales. T1 (no application; control), T2 (once a week), T3 (twice a week) and T4 (thrice a week). Traits such as tuber length, tuber diameter, tuber weight (per plant), and tuber yield (per m2) were measured; means of treatments were then sub- jected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by mean comparison test with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference Test. Rank in root tuber yield in all variables brevity of similar treatments had a P ? 0.001 signifi- cant effect on root tuber yield. The first rank in maximum tuber length (21.40 cm), tuber diameter (45.03 mm), tuber weight per plant (132.09 g) and yield (6.60 kg/m2) recorded at T4 level remained higher than other treatment units however the difference was found statistically sig- nificant up to 0.05% level of significance. T3 the next highest, and control had the lowest. Mean tuber weight per plant and yield (kg/m2) showed an obvious dose-response relationship with significant differences among means between all treatments. Based on the results, the applica- tion of hydroponic waste nutrient solution more frequently can signifi- cantly improve radish production, and applying hydroponic waste nutri- ent solution three times a week was the best treatment from this study. The results indicate that the nutrient-solution can be reused and that it is an efficient growth parameter for the cultivation of radish.



References:

  1. Fathidarehnijeh, E., Nadeem, M., Cheema, M., Thomas, R., Krishnapillai, M., & Gala-gedara, L. (2024). Current perspective on nutrient solution management strategies to improve the nutrient and water use efficiency in hydroponic systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 104(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2023-0034">https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2023-0034">https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2023-0034
  2. Hong, Y., Moon, J., Park, M., Son, J., & Yun, S. (2022). Fertilizer effect of waste nutrient solution in greenhouses for young radish cultivation. Journal of Bio-Environment Control, 31(4), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2022.31.4.460">https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2022.31.4.460">https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2022.31.4.460
  3. Li, H., Inokuchi, T., Nagaoka, T., Tamura, M., Hamada, S., & Suzuki, S. (2014). NO3 requirement and the quantitative management method of nutrient solution based on NO3 supply in hydroponic culture of radish plants. The Horticulture Journal, 83(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.CH-060">https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.CH-060">https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.CH-060
  4. National Academy of Agricultural Science. (2010). Fertilization standards for crop plants. Rural Development Administration.
  5. Reis, B. M. L., Oliveira, C. da S. de, Silva, M. D. A., Silva, M. P. da, Benett, K. S. S., Resende, C. L. P., & Rodrigues, F. Á. (2024). Growth Promotion of Raphanus sativus L.under Doses of Nitrogen with Application of Trichoderma spp.Journal of Sustainable Development,17(3), 39.https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v17n3p39
  6. Reyes, R. Y., & Neue, H. U. (1991). Characterization of the volcanic ejecta from Mount Pinatubo and its impact on rice production.
  7. Rosemarin, A., Carolus, J., Barquet, K., Ek, F., Jarnberg, L., Lorick, D., Johannesdottir, S., Pedersen, S. M., Koskiaho, J., Maenpaa, K., Poulsen, H. D., Hansen, M. N., Wiklicky, V., Matczak, P., Podedworna, B., Laatto, R., & Andersson, H. (2020). Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater: A review of technologies and practices. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 18,7883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2020.08.007
  8. Sakamoto, M., Komatsu, Y., & Suzuki, T. (2021). Nutrient deficiency affects the growth and nitrate concentration of hydroponic rad-ish. Horticulturae, 7(12), Article 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticul-turae7120525">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticul-turae7120525">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticul-turae7120525
  9. Yousaf, M., Bashir, S., Raza, H., Shah, A. N., Iqbal, J., Arif, M., Bukhari, M. A., Muhammad, S., Hashim, S., Alkahtani, J., & Alwahibi, M. S. (2021). Role of nitrogen and magnesium for growth, yield and nutritional quality of radish. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(5), 3021-3030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.043

19.) A Descriptive Study on the Effectiveness of the Scan-and-Learn Mobile Application in Enhancing Knowledge, Skills, and Engagement in Technical and Vocational Education

Referencs:

  1. Agustin, N. P. (2023). Kitchen Tools and Utensils Familiarity using Interactive Multimedia as an Intervention. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8746">https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8746">https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8746
  2. Barcelona, K. E. P., Daling, B. a. J., Doria, P., Bal-angiao, S. J., Mailes, M. J., Chiang, P. M., & Ubatay, D. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of TLE teachers in Philippine Public Schools: an inquiry. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(4), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0247">https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0247">https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0247
  3. Bawal, N. M. R., & Cuenca, Z. M. (2023). Mobile-Based Education app for improved performance in empowerment technologies. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 2(08). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijs-shmr.2023.v2i8n11">https://doi.org/10.58806/ijs-shmr.2023.v2i8n11">https://doi.org/10.58806/ijs-shmr.2023.v2i8n11
  4. Borromeo, C. , Fabro, R. B., Juan, S. G., Daquioag, D. V., Ladran, P. P., Blanco, J. A. & Balintec, C. G. (2025). Advancing Electrical Technology Education: Investigating the Impact of Immersive Simulation Tools on Hands-On Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(12), 6199-6218. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.06.12.2">http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.06.12.2">http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.06.12.2
  5. Cabutihan, J. V., Manaois, K. S., & Tomas, R. D. (2024) Challenges of Limited Equipment and Tools in Technology and Livelihood Laboratories and its Educational Implication: Basis for an Action Plan,IJRESM, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 106–114, Jun. 2024, https://journal.ijresm.com/in-dex.php/ijresm/article/view/3088">https://journal.ijresm.com/in-dex.php/ijresm/article/view/3088">https://journal.ijresm.com/in-dex.php/ijresm/article/view/3088
  6. Chakraborty, S. (2023). Empirical study on student satisfaction, learning outcomes, and usability of EdTech Apps. International Journal of Advanced Academic Studies, 5(1), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2023.v5.i1a.1399">https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2023.v5.i1a.1399">https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2023.v5.i1a.1399
  7. Ducena, L. W. B., & Ducena, E. Y. (2025). Improving the Performance of Cookery 9 Learners in Cleaning and Sanitizing Kitchen Tools through Contextualized Video-Assisted Lesson. International Social Sciences and Education Journal, 2(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.61424/is-sej.v2i2.184">https://doi.org/10.61424/is-sej.v2i2.184">https://doi.org/10.61424/is-sej.v2i2.184
  8. Eduria, A. J., Asuncion, A. C., Basamot, C. M. B., Paulino, C. J. B., Puyaoan, J. P. G., Lavega, J. A., ... & Fabro, R. B. B. (2025). Stitching the Future: Exploring the Role of Augmented Reality in Revolutionizing Fashion Design. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(10). https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000620">https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000620">https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000620
  9. Enguito, F., & Calipayan, J., Jr. (2025). Effectiveness of a developed video lesson on kitchen tools, equipment, and paraphernalia for TLE 8 cookery students. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.396">https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.396">https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.396
  10. Fabro, R. B., Rivera, J. C., Sambrano, L. C., & Joy, L. (2024). Perceptions and Extent of Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) among Filipino Students. Re-searchGate, 12(7). https://www.re-searchgate.net/publica-tion/383121815_Perceptions_and_Ex-tent_of_Utili zation_of_Generative_Artifi-cial_Intelligence_AI_among_Filipino_Stu-dents
  11. Garzón, J., Burgos, D., Kinshuk, N., & Tlili, A. (2025). Mobile learning significantly enhances student learning gains: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput-ers & Education, 238, 105415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105415">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105415">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105415
  12. Luctkar-Flude, M. (2024). Evaluating use of a mobile classroom response system in the classroom and the simulation lab.Queen’s University. Retrieved from https://www.aca-demia.edu/109216319/Evaluating_Use_of_a_Mobile_Classroom_Respo nse_System_in_the_Class-room_and_the_Simulation_Lab
  13. Maryani, I., Suyatno, S., Arfiani, I., Nizaar, M., As-tuti, I. A. D., & Sulisworo, D. (2025). Gamified Mobile-Based Learning Approach: Efforts to Improve Students’ Engagement and Learning Quality in Remote Schools in Indonesia. Educational Process International Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.179">https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.179">https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.179
  14. Meyer, M., Zosh, J. M., McLaren, C., Robb, M., McCaffery, H., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pa-sek, K., & Radesky, J. (2021). How educational are “educational” apps for young children? App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516">https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516">https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516
  15. Palomeras, P. A. (2024). Digitalized Learning module in Cookery for Grade 11 students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Re-search, 5(9), 3554–3560. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.05.09.14">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.05.09.14">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.05.09.14
  16. Pedraza, S. M., & Canoy, O. (2025b). Assessing the effectiveness of mobile learning apps in enhancing student learning and engagement in selected secondary public schools in General Trias City. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 45(9), 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.450909">https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.450909">https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.450909
  17. Quimco, K., Calvo, S., & Manulat, A. (2025). Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in TLE 9 Cookery through the use of Moodle as an adaptive learning tool. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.617">https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.617">https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.617
  18. Review of Intervention studies. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 56(12), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002
  19. Serrano, A. (2023). Experiential Mobile Learning: QR Code Driven Strategy in Teaching Thermodynamics in Science 12. Studies in Technology and Education, 2(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v2i1.43">https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v2i1.43">https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v2i1.43
  20. Singh, Y., & Suri, P. K. (2022). An empirical analysis of mobile learning app usage experience. Technology in Society, 68, 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-soc.2022.101929">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-soc.2022.101929">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-soc.2022.101929
  21. Togaibayeva, A., Ramazanova, D., Yessen-gulova, M., Yergazina, A., & Nurlin, A. (2022). Effect of mobile learning on students’ satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and academic performance when learning a foreign language. Frontiers in Education, 7, 946102. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102">https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102">https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102
  22. Van Der Horst, K., Smith, S., Blom, A., Catalano, L., De Allmeida Costa, A. I., Haddad, J., & Cunningham-Sabo, L. (2024). Outcomes of Children’s Cooking Programs: A Systematic

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic