Success Stories of Gamification Practices in Teaching Vocabulary Development to Non-Reading Learners: Elementary School Teachers in Focus
Michel Gascon | Josephine B. Baguio
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
1 Graduate School, Rizal Memorial Colleges, Inc., Davao, Philippines * Correspondence: josephinebbaguio@ou tlook.com Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 This phenomenological study examined success stories of gamification practices used by public elementary school teachers to support vocabulary development among nonreading learners in Malungon 4 District, Division of Sarangani, Philippines. Ten teachers who had at least three years of experience with gamified vocabulary instruction participated in in depth semi structured interviews. The analysis used reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterned meanings across accounts. Results showed three gamification practices: engagement through play, multisensory learning through gamification, and inclusive gamification strategies. Teachers made sense of gamification through perceived benefits, challenges in implementation, and adaptive strategies based on learner feedback. They offered insights that emphasized improvement in game design, accessibility for nonreaders, and future development through adaptive tools and institutional support. Teachers described gamification as a practical route to repeated exposure, safer participation, and more confident vocabulary use, yet they also stressed constraints tied to resources, time, and device access. Findings inform teacher development, school level planning, and literacy support policies that seek to widen access to vocabulary learning for learners who do not yet read.
References:
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
- Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
- Department of Education. (2023). Guidelines on the provision of supplementary learning resources for public school libraries and library hubs (DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_024.pdf
- Department of Education. (2024). Implementation of Catch-Up Fridays (DepEd Memorandum No. 001, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2024_001.pdf
- OECD. (2023a). Education GPS: Philippines, student performance (PISA 2022). https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=PHL&topic=PI&treshold=5
- OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
- OECD. (2023c). PISA 2022 results (Volumes I and II): Country note—Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html
- Sadeghi, K., Sağlık, E., Mede, E., Samur, Y., & Comert, Z. (2022). The effects of implementing gamified instruction on vocabulary gain and motivation among language learners. Heliyon, 8(11), e11811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11811
- Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
- Simsek, E., & Karakus Yilmaz, T. (2025). A systematic review of the effects of gamification in online learning environments on learning outcomes. Open Praxis, 17(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.692
- World Bank, & UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2022). Philippines learning poverty brief. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099000207152223103/pdf/IDU002b5536c0db4104ec3087d809906ec2eae56.pdf
ISSN 3116-3017 (Online)
ISSN 3116-3009 (Print)
Philippine E-Journals
