HomeInternational Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studiesvol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

VARK Learning Preferences and Teaching Styles in Science during Distance Learning

Marjorie Simbulan | Krigher Simbulan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

1 Pangasinan State University, Philippines * simbulanmarjorie@ psu.edu.ph Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 The COVID-19 pandemic significantly transformed the delivery of science education, requiring schools to adopt distance learning modalities. This study examined the learning styles of Grade 8 students and the teaching styles of Science teachers during distance learning at a private Catholic school in the Philippines during the School Year 2021-2022. Using a descriptive-comparative research design, data were collected from 99 students using a researcher-developed questionnaire based on the VARK framework. Findings revealed that students demonstrated high preferences across all VARK learning style dimensions, with Visual emerging as the dominant learning style. Teachers were perceived as employing all teaching style dimensions at a high level, with Reading/Writing identified as the most frequently used instructional approach. Results further revealed a significant difference between students' learning styles and teachers' teaching styles (t = -2.084, p = 0.040), indicating a mismatch between students' preferred learning styles and the teaching styles they experienced during distance learning. The study concludes that, while teachers used diverse instructional approaches, the dominant teaching style did not fully align with students' preferred learning styles. These findings underscore the importance of adopting flexible and multimodal instructional strategies that address diverse learner preferences and enhance science learning experiences in distance and blended learning environments. VARK Learning Preferences and Teaching Styles, IJTMS, 2 (2), 1029-1053, 2026 1030



References:

  1. Baclayon, J. C. (2019). Positive approach: Learning style preferences and teaching styles. Online Submission, 21, 88–116. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED629563.pdf
  2. Bulusan, F., Codamon-Dugyon, E. M., & Bolintao, J. J. M. (2022). Exploring the challenges of tertiary students in non-laboratory courses after the first year of emergency remote teaching. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.481
  3. Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
  4. Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2017). Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47, 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6
  5. Chmarkh, M. (2021). Writing to learn research: A synthesis of empirical studies (2004–2019). European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 85–96. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284474.pdf
  6. Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  7. Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
  8. Gangadharan, S., Al Mezeini, K., Gnanamuthu, S. S., & Al Marshoudi, K. A. (2025). The relationship between preferred learning styles and academic achievement of undergraduate health sciences students compared to other disciplines at a Middle Eastern university utilizing the VARK instrument. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S491487
  9. Gheyssens, E., Griful-Freixenet, J., & Struyven, K. (2023). Differentiated instruction as an approach to establish effective teaching in inclusive classrooms. In R. Maulana, M. Helms-Lorenz, & R. M. Klassen (Eds.), Effective teaching around the world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_30
  10. Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
  11. Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003
  12. Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140, 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464
  13. Lorente, L. M. L., Arrabal, A. A., & Pulido-Montes, C. (2020). The right to education and ICT during COVID-19: An international perspective. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 9091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219091
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d75eb0e8-en
  15. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  16. Raiyn, J. (2016). The role of visual learning in improving students' high-order thinking skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 115–121. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112894.pdf
  17. Salame, I. I., Tuba, M., & Nujhat, M. (2024). Note-taking and its impact on learning, academic performance, and memory. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17333a
  18. Zancajo, A., Verger, A., & Bolea, P. (2022). Digitalization and beyond: The effects of COVID-19 on post-pandemic educational policy and delivery in OECD countries. Policy and Society, 41(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab016