Fishbowl Discussion as an Instructional Intervention in Social Studies: Evidence from a Philippine Grade 8 Classroom
Shiela Donato | Paula Katleen Elveña | Francis Dave Mabborang | Evelyn Balbalec | Maria Rita Flores | Rhea A Quileza
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
The study examined whether fishbowl discussion was associated with changes in Grade 8 students' written assessment performance in Araling Panlipunan, particularly on the topic of European power expansion. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the study involved 39 students from a laboratory high school in the northern Philippines with complete paired pretest and posttest scores. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while qualitative data from inter- views with ten purposively selected students were analyzed themat- ically. Results showed that mean scores increased from 8.82 to 15.44 out of 30, corresponding to a shift in the mean performance classifi- cation from poor to good. The pretest-posttest difference was statis- tically significant, W = 34.50, p < .001, with a large matched-pairs rank-biserial correlation, r = .90. Qualitative findings further revealed that students perceived fishbowl discussion as helpful in deepening understanding, promoting engagement, building confidence, and sup- porting peer-assisted learning. However, some students also re- ported challenges, particularly speaking pressure and limited time for individual study. Although the one-group design limits causal claims, the findings suggest that fishbowl discussion can be a useful learner-centered strategy in social studies instruction when sup- ported by clear roles, structured guidelines, and inclusive facilitation.
References:
- Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a literature review and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121
- Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Gabay pangkurikulum sa Araling Panlipunan: Baitang 1-10 [K to 12 curriculum guide in social studies: Grades 1-10]. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-con-tent/uploads/2019/01/AP-CG.pdf
- Duyvesteyn, I., & van der Wal, A. M. (Eds.). (2022). World history for international studies. Leiden University Press. https://doi.org/10.24415/9789087284008
- Han, M., & Hamilton, E. R. (2023). Promoting engagement and learning: Using the fish-bowl strategy in online and hybrid college courses. College Teaching, 71(4), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.2024127
- Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
- Muehlensiepen, F., Mucke, J., Krusche, M., Kurkowski, S., Bendzuck, G., Koetter, I., Lemarié, V., Grahammer, M., Heinze, M., Schulze-Koops, H., & Knitza, J. (2021). The virtual fishbowl: Bringing back dynamic debates to medical conferences. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 80(5), 675-676. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219552
- Tricio, J., Montt, J., Orsini, C., Gracia, B., Pampín, F., Quinteros, C., Salas, M., Soto, R., & Fuentes, N. (2019). Student experiences of two small group learning-teaching formats: Seminar and fishbowl. European Journal of Dental Education, 23(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12414
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Young, J. (2007). Small group scored discussion: Beyond the fishbowl, or, everybody reads, everybody talks, everybody learns. The History Teacher, 40(2), 177-181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036986
- Yung, K. W.-H. (2020). Using public exam ques-tions in fishbowl debate to engage exam-oriented students in communicative lan-guage teaching. RELC Journal, 51(3), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219888055