Home⇛The Advanced Social Science in Research Journal⇛vol. 1 no. 4 (2026)

Intervention of Inclusive Education and Students’ Drop-Out Rate in Southern Samar National Comprehensive High School, Balangiga, Eastern Samar

Rose Ann M. Roncal | Alexis O. Caraga | Estelita A. Madriaga

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study determines the intervention of inclusive education and stu- dents' drop-out rate in Southern Samar National Comprehensive High School, Balangiga, Eastern Samar. The valuable insights into the effec- tiveness of inclusivity interventions and drop-out rate that is cur- rently implemented can inform future policy decisions, such as the development of more tailored training programs for teachers, alloca- tion of resources, and improvements to inclusive education strate- gies. The study employed a descriptive-correlational research design with total of 105 respondents from the different grade levels in South- ern Samar National Comprehensive High School, Balangiga, Eastern Samar. Findings revealed that the level of implementation of inclusive intervention in Southern Samar National Comprehensive High School, Balangiga, Eastern Samar in terms of Assistive Technology with a mean score of 2.87 interpreted as moderately commendable this points need for more extensive training, seminar, and profes- sional development in inclusive education. The limited training on as- sistive technology led to lack of technology assistive tools and effec- tive instruction. In terms of differentiated instruction, a mean score of 4.48 interpreted as Highly Commendable and highly committed to differentiate instruction in inclusive education, they utilized different resources to support diverse learners. However, collaborative learn- ing got mean score 4.55 interpreted as Highly Commendable this em- ploys that in inclusive education must be a collaborative in nature from instruction, strategies, and shared responsibility. The level of in- clusive education intervention was a commendable with a mean score of 4.12 on the part of teachers in Southern Samar National Com- prehensive High School, Balangiga, Eastern Samar. While, the drop- out rate was low but it remains a challenge to everyone it must be zero drop-out rate in inclusive education. The correlational analysis revealed that there is a strong significant relationship between the level of implementation of inclusive education intervention and drop- out rate in Southern Samar National Comprehensive High School, Bal- angiga, Eastern Samar wherein inclusive teaching strategies are more extensively and consistently applied tend to have lower dropout rates. *Corresponding author: E-mail: roncalann2@gmail.com R A M Roncal, A O Caraga, & E A Madriaga, 2026 / Intervention of Inclusive Education and Students' Drop-Out Rate in Southern... ASSRJ 886



References:

  1. Adamopoulos, I. P., & Syrou, N. F. (2022). Associations and correlations of job stress, job satisfaction and burn out in public health sector. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 6(2), em0113. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/12166
  2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy,6(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  3. Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational psychology review,30(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8
  4. Anderson, D., Bates, S., Lawson, H. A., Childs, T. M., & Iachini, A. L. (2022). The community collaboration model for school improvement: A scoping review. Education Sci-ences,12(12), 918.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120918
  5. Asis, J. M. N., Caballes, D. G., & Ortiz, O. E. (2023). Instructional competence of public secondary School teachers in the district of Naic: Basis for instructional enhancement program. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends,2(1), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v2n1a114
  6. Calderon, J.F. & Gonzalez, E.C. (2018). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. National Book Store, Manila, Philippines.
  7. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing,25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  8. Chu, M. W., Craig, H. L., Yeworiew, L. B., & Xu, Y. (2020). Teachers' unpreparedness to accommodate student needs. Canadian journal of school psychology,35(3), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573520916610
  9. Cook, S. C., & Rao, K. (2018). Systematically applying UDL to effective practices for students with learning disabilities. Learning disability quar-terly,41(3), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717749936
  10. Daily, S. M., Mann, M. J., Lilly, C. L., Dyer, A. M., Smith, M. L., & Kristjansson, A. L. (2020). School climate as an intervention to reduce academic failure and educate the whole child: a longitudinal study. Journal of School Health,90(3), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12863
  11. Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2020). Differentiated instruction: the diversity of teachers' philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students' interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education,26(14), 1383-1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739
  12. Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research,97, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014
  13. Gilmour, A. F., & Wehby, J. H. (2020). The association between teaching students with disabilities and teacher turnover. Journal of Educational Psychology,112(5), 1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000394
  14. Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2023). Conceptualizing inclusive education: the role of teacher training and teacher's attitudes towards inclusion of children with disabilities in Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education,27(9), 1042-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1879958
  15. Horner, R., & Monzalve-Macaya, M. (2018). A framework for building safe and effective school environments: Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS). https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-4-663
  16. Hovey, K. A., Gauvreau, A. N., & Lohmann, M. J. (2022). Providing multiple means of action and expression in the early childhood classroom through a Universal Design for Learning framework. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship,11(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1150
  17. Kausik, N. H., & Hussain, D. (2023). The impact of inclusive education on academic motivation, academic self-efficacy, and well-being of students with learning disability. Journal of Education,203(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057421103195
  18. Kuade, G. (2021).Inclusive school barriers to children with disabilities at early childhood centers in the New Juabeng Municipality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Education, Winneba). http://41.74.91.244:8080/han-dle/123456789/2431
  19. Luesse, H. B., Luesse, J. E., Lawson, J., Camp, M. J., & Diaz, K. G. (2022). The academy for teachers professional development program. A model to support teacher retention.Cogent Education,9(1), 2140540. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2140540
  20. McCombes, S. (2020). Descriptive Research D-sign: Definition, Methods and Examples. Retrieved on November 24, 2020, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodol-ogy/descriptive-research/
  21. Mohamed, A. H. H. (2018). Attitudes of special education teachers towards using technology in inclusive classrooms: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs,18(4), 278-288.https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12411
  22. Olatunji, G., Faturoti, O., Jaiyeoba, B., Tolu-wabori, A. V., Adefusi, T., Olaniyi, P., ... & Abdulbasit, M. O. (2023). Navigating unique challenges and advancing equitable care for children with ADHD in Africa: a review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery,85(10), 4939-4946. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001179
  23. Rubtsov, V. V. (2020). Two Approaches to the Problem of Development in the Context of Social Interactions: LS Vygotsky vs J. Pia-get. Cultural-Historical Psychology,16(3). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160302
  24. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2022). Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties. FWU Journal of Social Sciences,16(4), 89-101. http://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7
  25. Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Mpolomoka, D. L., Ak-pan, W. M., & Davy, M. (2024). Curriculum design for the digital age: Strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Re-search,11(07), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZE-NODO.13123899
  26. Thornton, C., Miller, P., & Perry, K. (2020). The impact of group cohesion on key success measures in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education,44(4), 542-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1594727
  27. Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2023). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented(pp. 599-628). Routledge. https:/ https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003419426-22
  28. Ulanday, M. L., Centeno, Z. J., Bayla, M. C., & Cal-lanta, J. (2021). Flexible learning adaptabilities in the new normal: E-learning resources, digital meeting platforms, online learning systems and learning engagement. Asian Journal of Distance Education,16(2). https://asianjde.com/ojs/in-dex.php/AsianJDE/article/view/580
  29. Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and education open,3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100