Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 9 (2026)

Learning Environment and Science Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Junior High School Students’ Scientific Literacy

Niño C. Ojanola | Edwin A. Acain | Kristine Mae M. Bangkas | Clarimie O. Ligas | Sancia M. Ruiz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Scientific literacy among Filipino junior high school students remains a concern, as reflected in their consistently low performance in international assessments. Given this context, this study aimed to determine the association of the learning environment and science self-efficacy with the scientific literacy of junior high school students. A quantitative, non- experimental correlational research design was employed. The respondents were 105 Grade 9 and Grade 10 students from a private junior high school in Davao City during the Academic Year 2025-2026, selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using adapted and validated questionnaires measuring learning environment, science self-efficacy, and scientific literacy. Mean, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results revealed high levels of learning environment (M = 4.09), science self-efficacy (M = 3.89), and scientific literacy (M = 4.10). Using correlational analysis, the study found that the learning environment was strongly and positively associated with scientific literacy (r = .64, p < .001), while science self-efficacy also showed a significant positive association with scientific literacy (r = .57, p < .001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the two variables jointly explained 45.5% of the variance in scientific literacy (R2 = .455, F (2, 102) = 42.65, p < .001), with learning environment demonstrating a larger standardized regression coefficient (β = .47) than science self-efficacy (β = .27). Both variables significantly predicted scientific literacy, with the learning environment emerging as the stronger predictor. These findings are consistent with Constructivist Learning Theory, which emphasizes that knowledge develops through meaningful experiences and social interaction. The study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of learning environment and science self-efficacy in relation to scientific literacy among junior high school students.



References:

  1. Acut, D., & Antonio, R. (2023). Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) approach on students' learning outcomes in science education: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 718. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2151
  2. Aikens, M., & Kulacki, A. (2023). Identifying group work experiences that increase students' self-efficacy for quantitative biology tasks. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0076
  3. Ali, H.H., Bashir, R., Raza, A.A., Ejaz, H., Shabir, R., & Aftab, M.J. (2024). Role of inclusive education in promoting equity in education: Teacher's Perspectives. https://tinyurl.com/32jnwp64
  4. Antonio, R., & Prudente, M. (2021). Metacognitive argument-driven inquiry in teaching antimicrobial resistance: Effects on students conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
  5. Appiah-Twumasi, E. (2024). Predicting physics students' academic performance: The impact of attitude, self-efficacy, and personality traits. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.13
  6. Aquino, J., Caingcoy, W., Zamora, R., & Diquito, T., Jr. (2025). Scientific literacy assessment using Bybee's scientific model: Towards a more sustainable science education. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i1.207
  7. Ayoola, F. (2024). Undergraduate physics self-efficacy measurement and gender influence. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(3), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31289
  8. Azidi, R.E., & Rijal, K. (2024). Science learning in the context of "Indigenous Knowledge" for sustainable development. Journal, 1(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10880
  9. Baltikian, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2024). Assessment of scientific literacy levels among secondary school students in Lebanon: Exploring gender-based differences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2407. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14279
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129.n6
  11. Bandura, A., Freeman, W.H., & Lightsey, R. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13, 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  12. Beck, C., & Blumer, L. (2021). The relationship between perceptions of instructional practices and student self-efficacy in guided-inquiry laboratory courses. Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0076
  13. Bhandari, P. (2023). Quantitative research: Methods, types and examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/
  14. Bizimana, E. (2026). Student engagement in learning: Exploring the role of perceived student cohesiveness, equity, teacher support, and teacher autonomy support under the framework of Self-Determination Theory. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024500
  15. Bobbitt, Z. (2021). How to report Cronbach's alpha (with examples). Statology. https://www.statology.org/how-to-report-cronbachs-alpha/
  16. Boholano, H., Cajes, R., & Stewart, B. (2021). Technology based teaching and learning in junior high school. Research in Pedagogy, 11(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2101098b
  17. Bouni, A., Nchia, L.N., Sigha, P.-M., Mfeyet, B.-A., Aimée, A.N., Ateba, J.A., Nchinmoun, M., Meli, N.D., & Soudani, M. (2024). The foundations of the nature of science as a tool for teaching and learning scientific concepts. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1589
  18. Bowden, J. L.-H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207- 1224. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
  19. Brandisauskiene, A., Buksnyte-Marmiene, L., Cesnaviciene, J., & Jarasiunaite-Fedosejeva, G. (2023). The relationship between teacher's autonomy-supportive behavior and learning strategies applied by students: The role of teacher support and equity. SAGE Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181384
  20. Britner, S., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
  21. Bulado, A.M., Amper, M., Daling, Z.A., Entima, D.G., Madamba, S.B., Millara, L., Ombac, C.L., Paradiang, G., Pedronio, D., Semaña, A.M., Yucor, M.J., Clamares, K.J., & Pelandas, A.M. (2025). The influence of classroom learning environment and study habits on academic engagement of junior high school students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(III), 1596-1607. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90300126
  22. Burns, E., Martin, A., Kennett, R., Pearson, J., & Munro-Smith, V. (2020a). Optimizing science self-efficacy: A multilevel examination of the moderating effects of anxiety on the relationship between self-efficacy and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101937
  23. Çelik, M., & Doğru, M. (2024). Development of an attitude scale towards science literacy for secondary school pupils. Journal of Turkish Science Education. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.017
  24. Cheung, K.K.C., & Erduran, S. (2022). A systematic review of research on family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 32(5), 1637-1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3
  25. Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  26. Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022). Self-efficacy and perceived recognition by peers, instructors, and teaching assistants in physics predict bioscience majors' science identity. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0273621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273621
  27. Dabran-Zivan, S., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2025). The importance of science education, scientific knowledge, and evaluation strategies for the successful detection of COVID-19 misinformation. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70000
  28. Dunbar-Wallis, A., Katcher, J., Moore, W., & Corwin, L. (2024). Bee the CURE: Increasing student science self-efficacy, science identity, and predictors of scientific civic engagement in a community college CURE. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-01-0015
  29. Ekici, G., Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Çıbık, A.S. (2024). Biology self efficacy beliefs of the students studying in the Department of Biology and Department of Biology teaching. https://iojes.net/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&makale_id=41228
  30. Fraser, B. (2023). The evolution of the field of learning environments research. Educ. Sci., 13, 257.
  31. Gillies, R. (2023). Using cooperative learning to enhance students' learning and engagement during inquiry-based science. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121242
  32. Hanson, C. (2022). Developing scientific literacy to promote 21st-century skills in students [Masterʼs thesis, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/863
  33. He, L., Chen, Y., Xiong, X., Zou, X., & Lai, K. (2021). Does science literacy guarantee resistance to health rumors? The moderating effect of self-efficacy of science literacy in the relationship between science literacy and rumor belief. ideas.repec.org. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2243-d505103.html
  34. Huang, L., Al-Rashidi, A.H., & Bayat, S. Teacher support in language learning: A picture of the effects on language progress, academic immunity, and academic enjoyment. BMC Psychol 12, 124 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01602-2
  35. Jabello, P.G.G. (2021a, September). Scientific literacy and academic achievement of Grade 8 science students (Thesis, University of Southeastern Philippines). Talandang National High School, Brgy. Talandang, Tugbok District, Davao City. ResearchGate. https://tinyurl.com/kwhz8hzw
  36. Jabello, P.G.G. (2021b, September). Scientific literacy and academic achievement of Grade 8 science students (Thesis, University of Southeastern Philippines). Talandang National High School, Brgy. Talandang, Tugbok District, Davao City. ResearchGate. https://tinyurl.com/kwhz8hzw
  37. Jufrida, J., Basuki, F.R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M.D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(4), 630. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312
  38. Joosse, A., & Barger, A. (2025). Building cohesive classroom communities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 35(1), Article 6. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijtlhe/vol35/iss1/6/
  39. Junanto, T., Budiyono, B., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2024). Listen-search-read-discuss: An innovative lesson design to improve students' scientific literacy in higher education International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(6), 4073. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.29897
  40. Juniarso, T., & Sulistyawati, I. (2023). The effect of self-efficacy on scientific literacy: A correlation study in elementary school students. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran ke-SD-an, 9(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v9i1.2203
  41. Kaçar, T., Terzi, R., Arıkan, İ., & Kırıkçı, A.C. (2021). The effect of inquiry-based learning on academic success: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(2), 15-23. https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/6633
  42. Kamila, K., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, J., & Ungirwalu, S.Y. (2024). Analysis of integrating local potential in science learning and its effect on 21st century skills and student cultural awareness: Literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6485
  43. Kelp, N., McCartney, M., Sarvary, M., Shaffer, J., & Wolyniak, M. (2023). Developing science literacy in students and society: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00058-23
  44. Kim, J., Yoon, S., & Hong, S. (2024). Exploring influencing factors at student and teacher/school levels on science self-efficacy using machine learning and multilevel latent profile analysis. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241284915
  45. Kumi-Manu, R.N. (2021). Concept cartoon as a teaching technique for conceptual change: A Ghanaian junior high school experience. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(9), 587-599.
  46. Kurbanoğlu, N.İ., Demirtaş, Z., & Batur, A. (2023). The role of student-teacher relation on science self-efficacy and science anxiety in face-to-face and distance education. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194408
  47. Levinson, M., Geron, T., & Brighouse, H. (2022). Conceptions of educational equity. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221121344
  48. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
  49. Mamauag, R. (2023). Probing students' self-efficacy, creativity and performance in biology through metacognitive blogging. JETT, 14(3), 210-220. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8951317
  50. Mameli, C., Caricati, L., & Molinari, L. (2020). That's not fair! The effects of teacher justice and academic achievement on self and other's resistant agency. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(4), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12335
  51. Mohamad, S. (2024). Learning environment and academic engagement in science of junior high school students. International Journal of Research Publications, 141(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001411120246031
  52. Moreno, C., Pham, D., & Ye, L. (2021). Chemistry self-efficacy in lower-division chemistry courses: Changes after a semester of instruction and gaps still remain between student groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 772-785. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00345J
  53. Muijs, D. (2021). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/4jxexfhv
  54. Mustafaoglu, F.M., & Alkan, F. (2024). An analysis of high school students' laboratory self-efficacy beliefs and perceptions of laboratory applications. Periódico Tchê Química, 21(48), 16 48. https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v21.n48.2024_02_fatma_pgs_16_48.pdf
  55. Naibert, N., Duck, K., Phillips, M., & Barbera, J. (2021). Multi-institutional study of self-efficacy within flipped chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1489-1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01361
  56. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  57. Nuñala, J.N., & Bete, J. (2024a). Internet dependence and fact-checking among senior high school learners in Davao City. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, XI(VII), 12251244. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2024.1107096
  58. Nzomo, C.M., Rugano, P., Njoroge, J.M., & Gitonga, C.M. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and students' self-efficacy in chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(1), e12672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672
  59. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes - Philippines. OECD Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/49hbsz76
  60. Onowugbeda, F., Agbanimu, D., Okebukola, P., Ibukunolu, A., Odekeye, O.T., & Olori, O. (2023). Reducing anxiety and promoting meaningful learning of biology concepts through a culturally sensitive and context-specific instructional method. International Journal of Science Education, 45(15), 1303-1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2202799
  61. Pacala, F.A. (2022). Is the scientific literacy of the Philippines in the ICU? ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 3(3), 291-296. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v3i3.56743
  62. Palines, K.M., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. (2021). Facilitating factors of scientific literacy skills development among junior high school students. LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.9.1.1520
  63. Peterson, T., Dodson, J., Sherwin, R., & Strale, F. (2024). An internal consistency reliability study of the catalyst data finch applied behavior analysis data collection application with autistic individuals. Cureus, 16(4), e58379. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58379
  64. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. https://archive.org/details/psychologyofchil00piag_0/page/n7/mode/2up
  65. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000006133
  66. Pondang, K., Madulid, A., Lotilla, J., Agot, K., Rufil, G., Cabalhin, J., & Agustin, L. (2025). The relationship between learning environment and self- efficacy among senior high school students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(II), 1819-1832. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.9020148
  67. Rallyta, D., Ruswan, & Tauhidah, D. (2025). The relationship between self-efficacy and science anxiety with science literacy among senior high school students in biology learning. Bioeduca Journal of Biology Education, 7(2), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.21580/bioeduca.v7i2.28906
  68. Resnik, D. (2020). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://tinyurl.com/5c3he4jm
  69. Riben, S., Arsyad, M., & Helmi, H. (2024). Guided inquiry method and self-efficacy on high school students' physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 8(2), 356-364. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v8i2.68657
  70. Rigacci, A. (2024, July 30). What is cooperative learning? Five strategies for your classroom. Europass Teacher Academy. https://tinyurl.com/yx3nfnjm
  71. Robinson, K., Perez, T., White-Levatich, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2022). Gender differences and roles of two science self-efficacy beliefs in predicting post-college outcomes. Journal of Experimental Education, 90(2), 344-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944
  72. Romli, S., Suhandi, A., Muslim, M., & Kaniawati, I. (2024). Research trends in the development of learning models oriented to increasing scientific literacy: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i1.20517
  73. Sailaubay, A., Myrzakhmetova, N., Tunçel, M., & Kishibayev, K. (2024). Analysis of the relationships between university students' laboratory self-efficacy beliefs, science process skills and achievement in chemistry courses. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(2), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.1
  74. Santhalia, P.W., & Yuliati, L. (2021). An exploration of scientific literacy on physics subjects within phenomenon-based experiential learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p72-82
  75. Saraswati, Y., Indana, N.S., & Sudibyo, N.E. (2021). Science literacy profile of junior high school students based on knowledge, competence, cognitive, and context aspects. IJORER International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(3), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i3.118
  76. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2021). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. https://tinyurl.com/4rhr2rra
  77. Scanlon, E. (2021). Educational technology research: Contexts, complexity and challenges. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.580
  78. Schizas, D., Psillos, D., & Asimopoulos, S. (2024). Advancing scientific literacy: Integrating nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry in teaching Griffith's and Avery-MacLeod- McCarty experiments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20(4), e2421. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/15522
  79. Scott, F. (2024, June 28). Improve students' scientific literacy through inquiry. RSC Education. https://tinyurl.com/yk3zs489
  80. Shao, Y., Feng, Y., Zhao, X., Liu, G., & Zhang, L. (2025). Teacher support and secondary school students' learning engagement: A moderated mediation model. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87366-0
  81. Smist, J.M. (1993). General chemistry and self-efficacy. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED36855
  82. Supervía, P.U., Bordás, C.S., & Lorente, V.M. (2020). The mediating role of goal orientation (task) in the relationship between engagement and academic self-concept in students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228323
  83. Susanti, T., Damris, D., Maison, M., & Tanti, T. (2020). Learning environment and motivation in junior high school. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2047-2056. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080542
  84. Susdarwati, S., Dimas, A., & Hannum, F. (2021). The development of scientific literacy-based physics learning module on direct current circuit material. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1869(1), 012164. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012164
  85. Taber, K. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  86. Thomas, C., Sarma, K.P., Gajula, S.S., & Jayagopi, D.B. (2022). Automatic prediction of presentation style and student engagement from videos. Computers and Education Artificial
  87. Intelligence, 3, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100079
  88. Torres, I., & Inga, E. (2025). Fostering STEM skills through programming and robotics for motivation and cognitive development in secondary education. Information, 16(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020096
  89. United Nations. (2024). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
  90. Vea, A. (2025, May 8). Learning environment: Types and how to create a positive one. SMOWL Proctoring | Supervision system for online exams. https://smowl.net/en/blog/learning-environment/
  91. Veerman, G., & Denessen, E. (2021). Social cohesion in schools: A non-systematic review of its conceptualization and instruments. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.1940633
  92. Verawati, N.N.S.P., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Raising the issue of local wisdom in science learning and its impact on increasing students' scientific literacy. Journal, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10881
  93. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://tinyurl.com/3zz9tjwb
  94. Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Uyun, M., Afandi, M., & Hamengkubuwono, H. (2021). The impact of collaborative learning on learners' critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 443-460. http://repository.iaincurup.ac.id/336/
  95. Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Chen, H. (2022). Measuring science self-efficacy with a focus on the perceived competence dimension: Mixed-methods instrument development and longitudinal change. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00363-x

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic