Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 9 (2026)

ESG Ratings and Accounting Information Quality among Philippine Publicly Listed Companies

Nyssa Cassandra F. Agtarap | Jan Patrick A. Bito-on | Trixia May A. Cañedo | Krystel Ann B. Capulan | Queen K L. Jabat | Jacy Anjelinn P. Lamata | Chryss Angela P. Samillano

Discipline: accounting

 

Abstract:

Evidence linking environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance to financial reporting credibility comes overwhelmingly from developed and large emerging markets, and little of it addresses accrual- based accounting information quality (AIQ) in the Philippines, where sustainability reporting is mandated on a comply-or-explain basis and independent assurance remains uncommon. This study examined the relationship between ESG ratings and the AIQ of Philippine publicly listed companies. A descriptive-correlational design used secondary data from London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) ESG ratings and audited financial statements filed with the Philippine Stock Exchange for fiscal year 2023. Descriptive analysis covered 40 firms across the consumer, financial, holding, industrial, and property sectors; the regression was estimated on the 31 firms remaining after nine influential observations were removed. ESG performance was described at both overall-score and pillar levels; the overall score served as the regression predictor. AIQ was estimated using the Modified Jones Model, in which higher absolute discretionary accruals denote lower quality. Descriptive results showed satisfactory overall ESG performance (M = 54.60, SD = 12.20), the Social pillar the most consistent and Governance the most variable. Multiple regression indicated that industry, years of operation, market capitalization, and ESG rating jointly explained a significant share of variance in discretionary accruals, R2 = .56, adjusted R2 = .42, F(7, 23) = 4.10, p = .005, f2 = 1.25. ESG rating was a significant positive predictor of discretionary accruals (B = 0.001, p = .040), indicating lower AIQ among more highly rated firms; industry classification was the strongest determinant, while years of operation and market capitalization were not significant. The findings suggest that where sustainability disclosure is mandated but lightly verified, ESG ratings should not be treated as a proxy for accounting credibility, and that sector-specific reporting discipline exerts the stronger influence.



References:

  1. Ali, A., Siregar, H., & Fitriani, R. (2021). Accounting information quality on micro, small, and medium enterprise: A necessity? Aset (Accounting Research Journal), 13(2), 143-151. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/aset/article/view/51122
  2. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.33235/jarna.22.2.27-30
  3. Burgos, C. P., Namoc, I. S., Padilla, J. P., & Flores, J. M. (2022). The influence of accounting information system on the organizational performance among SMEs in Tagum City. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(5), 781-790. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.05.06
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Columbano, C., Biondi, L., & Bracci, E. (2023). Properties of accrual accounts in public sector entities: Evidence from the Italian National Health Service. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(6), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-06-2023-0101
  6. Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics, 19(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493
  7. Dai, Z. (2024). ESG performance and improvement of corporate accounting information quality. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 37, 184-202. https://doi.org/10.54097/k3wtnn35
  8. Daud, S. N. M., Ghazali, N. S., & Ismail, N. H. M. (2024). ESG, innovation, and economic growth: An empirical evidence. Studies in Economics and Finance, 41(4), 845-870. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-11-2023-0692
  9. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248303
  10. Effect of ESG factors on the financial performance of Philippine firms. (2023). The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v25i1.5863
  11. Gafni, D., Palas, R., Baum, I., & Solomon, D. (2024). ESG regulation and financial reporting quality: Friends or foes? Finance Research Letters, 61, Article 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105017
  12. González-Pozo, R., Arenas-Parra, M., Quiroga-García, R., & Bilbao-Terol, A. (2024). A proposal for refining the ESG methodology used by rating agencies. International Transactions in Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13550
  13. Ifediora, C., Idhlolo, I., & Halim, H. (2024). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors as key factors in real estate investment decision: Mixed use properties. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 12(4), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijdes.13/vol12n41628
  14. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  15. Karim, S., Manab, N. A., & Ismail, R. B. (2020). Assessing the governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility, and performance: The moderating effect of board independence. Global Business Review, 24(3), 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920917773
  16. Legaspi, J. L. R., Avila, E. T. T., & Castro, M. B. C. C. (2024). How do publicly listed companies report on sustainability? A mapping of the standard/framework used by industrial firms in the Philippines. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 5(2). https://journalkeberlanjutan.com/index.php/ijesss/article/view/236
  17. Li, Q., Tang, W., & Li, Z. (2024). ESG systems and financial performance in industries with significant environmental impact: A comprehensive analysis. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, Article 1454822. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1454822
  18. Liu, X. (2023). Corporate ESG performance and accounting information quality. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 3, 229-244. https://doi.org/10.62051/pr6x9r17
  19. LSEG. (n.d.). ESG scores. London Stock Exchange Group. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/sustainable-finance/esg-scores
  20. Maali, K., Rakia, R., & Khaireddine, M. (2021). How corporate social responsibility mediates the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability performance in UK: A multiple mediator analysis. Society and Business Review, 16(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2020-0143
  21. Mashayekhi, B., Asiaei, K., Rezaee, Z., Jahangard, A., Samavat, M., & Homayoun, S. (2024). The relative importance of ESG pillars: A two-step machine learning and analytical framework. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5404-5420. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2979
  22. Nathania, R., & Ekawati, E. (2024). Banking on ESG: How ownership influences financial outcomes in 5-ASEAN countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(3), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(3).2024.11
  23. Özer, G., Aktaş, N., & Çam, İ. (2024). Corporate environmental, social, and governance activities and financial reporting quality: An international investigation. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(3), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.03.001
  24. Pathak, R., & Gupta, R. D. (2022). Environmental, social and governance performance and earnings management-The moderating role of law code and creditor's rights. Finance Research Letters, 47, Article 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102849
  25. Phan, T. C. (2024). Impact of green investments, green economic growth, and renewable energy consumption on environmental, social, and governance practices to achieve the sustainable development goals: A sectoral analysis in the ASEAN economies. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790241231725
  26. Republic of the Philippines. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173). Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
  27. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2019). Sustainability reporting guidelines for publicly-listed companies (Memorandum Circular No. 4, Series of 2019). Republic of the Philippines. https://www.sec.gov.ph/mc-2019/mc-no-04-s-2019-sustainability-reporting-guidelines-for-publicly-listed-companies/
  28. Shafwan, N., Nadirsyah, & Ridwan. (2023). The influence of the effectiveness of the accounting information system, internal auditor quality, and human resource competence on the quality of financial reporting. Research and Practice in Social Sciences. https://ijsh.ph/index.php/rp/article/view/73
  29. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
  30. Ștefănescu, C. A., & Robu, I.-B. (2020). Improving the quality of the financial accounting information through strengthening of the financial autonomy at public organizations. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-06-2020-0059
  31. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  32. Wang, W., Yu, Y., & Li, X. (2022). ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 948674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674
  33. Yulianto, B. M., & Ulpah, M. (2024). Pengaruh environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dan competitive advantage terhadap kinerja perusahaan: Studi pada emerging Asia periode 2018-2022. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 9(8), 4360-4376. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i8.16240
  34. Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Aldaz-Odriozola, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility oriented boards and triple bottom line performance: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), Article e300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.3

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic