Home⇛Isabela State University Linker The Journal of Emerging Research in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry⇛vol. 6 no. 1 (2026)

Consumer Acceptability and Sensory Evaluation of Pork Patties with Glutinous Rice Flour as Binder

Mary Grace T. Hista | Romeo Jay B. Sollestre | Joshua C. Filiminiano | Jade S. Sabongan

Discipline: food sciences

 

Abstract:

Consumer demand for ready-to-eat pork products in the Philippines has increased the need for affordable and functional binders in processed meats. However, limited research has examined the use of glutinous rice flour (GRF), a locally available amylopectin-rich starch, as a binder for pork patties. This preliminary sensory evaluation assessed the sensory qualities and consumer acceptability of pork patties formulated with varying levels of GRF. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four treatments (T1: breadcrumbs, T2: 2% GRF, T3: 3% GRF, and T4: 5% GRF) and three replications was employed. Ten untrained panelists evaluated odor, juiciness, tenderness, flavor, and overall acceptability using a 5-point Hedonic Scale. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at a 5% significance level. Significant differences were observed in odor, juiciness, and flavor (p < 0.05). T3 recorded the highest odor and flavor ratings, while T4 obtained the highest juiciness rating. In contrast, T2 received the lowest odor and juiciness scores, whereas T1 had the lowest flavor rating. Tenderness and overall acceptability did not differ significantly among treatments, although T3 and T4 obtained the highest overall acceptability rating. The results suggest that GRF at 3–5% may be a promising and low-cost binder for pork patties. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because they are based on a small panel of 10 untrained consumers. Future studies should include larger consumer panels, nutritional profiling, cooking loss and moisture analyses, shelf-life evaluation, and economic feasibility assessments.



References:

  1. Ciobanu, M. M., Manoliu, D. R., Ciobotaru, M. C., Flocea, E. I., & Boiș teanu, P. C. (2025). Dietary fibres in processed meat: A review on nutritional enhancement, technological effects, sensory implications and consumer perception. Foods, 14(9), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091459
  2. Colle, M., & Bass, P. (2020, November 4). Meat and potato … starch. The National Provisioner. Retrieved from https://www.provisioneronline.com/articles/110155- meat-and-potato-starch.
  3. Department of Agriculture. (2022). Philippine hog industry roadmap 2022-2026. Department of Agriculture–Bureau of Agricultural Research. https://www.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Philippine-Hog-IndustryRoadmap.pdf.
  4. Gao, X., Zhang, W., & Zhou, G. (2014). Effects of glutinous rice flour on the physiochemical and sensory qualities of ground pork patties. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 58(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.02.044.
  5. Global Ag Media. (2024, September 3). Philippine pork consumption to rise 2% in 2024. The Pig Site. https://www.thepigsite.com/news/2024/09/philippine-porkconsumption-to-rise-2-in-2024.
  6. Jung, A. J., Sharma, A., Chung, M., Wallace, T. C., & Lee, H. J. (2024). The Relationship of Pork Meat Consumption with Nutrient Intakes, Diet Quality, and Biomarkers of Health Status in Korean Older Adults. Nutrients, 16(23), 4188. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16234188.
  7. Monica, M., Fitriani, A., & Setyaji, H. (2024). Use of chitosan and white glutinous rice flour on the quality of chicken meat burger. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, 2(5), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v2i5.1926
  8. Ohbayashi, K., Sugiyama, Y., Nohmi, T., Nishimura, K., Nakazaki, T., Sato, Y. I., ... & Iwasaki, Y. (2024). Anekomochi glutinous rice provides low postprandial glycemic response by enhanced insulin action via GLP-1 release and vagal afferents activation. The Journal of Physiological Sciences, 74(1), 1–12. https://jps.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12576-024-00940-5.
  9. Owusu-Ansah, P., Besiwah, E. K., Bonah, E., & Amagloh, F. K. (2022). Non-meat ingredients in meat products: A scoping review. Applied Food Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100044.
  10. Peetitungwong, S., Chonmanawat, M., Santiwattana, P., Sirisukpornchai, T., Kaewsaad, T., & Theprugsa, P. (2020). The usage of rice bran flour and pea protein in pork patties and pork meatballs. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 16(2), 329–338. https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/IJAT/10992808.pdf.
  11. Pereira, J., Hu, H., Xing, L., Zhang, W., & Zhou, G. (2019). Influence of rice flour, glutinous rice flour, and tapioca starch on the functional properties and quality of an emulsion-type cooked sausage. Foods, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010009.
  12. Pintado, T., & Delgado-Pando, G. (2020). Towards more sustainable meat products: Extenders as a way of reducing meat content. Foods, 9(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081044.
  13. San Antonio, M. J., Asprec, M. J., Angeles Jr, I., & Castro, M. (2024). Microbiological, Nutrient Analysis and Sensory Acceptability of Bottled Rice Eel (Monopterus Albus) In Spanish Oil Style with Different Fruit Flavorings. Linker (The Journal of Emerging Research in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry), 4(2), 16– 34. https://doi.org/10.65141/jeraff.v4i2.n2
  14. Van Buren, J. B., Puga, K. J., Hoffman, K. C., Nasados, J. A., Bass, P. D., & Colle, M. J. (2023). Water binders in beef patties increase yield and extend shelf life. Translational Animal Science, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad091.
  15. Yi, H. C., Cho, H., Hong, J. J., Ryu, R. K., Hwang, K. T., & Regenstein, J. M. (2012). Physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics of seasoned beef patties with added glutinous rice flour. Meat science, 92(4), 464-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.012.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic