HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 41 no. 5 (2025)

Effectiveness of Enhanced Modules as a Targeted Intervention to Improve Grade 4 Learners’ Mathematical Competency

Lalyn Pablo | Jimmy Bernabe Maming | Jhoselle Tus

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Mathematics plays a vital role in developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, many learners, especially in the early grades, struggle with foundational concepts due to the abstract nature of the subject and lack of targeted instructional strategies. This study investigated the effectiveness of enhanced mathematics modules as a structured intervention to improve the numeracy proficiency of Grade 4 learners. Employing a pre-test-post-test control Group Design, the study involved 40 pupils from a division school in Romblon, who were stratified based on prior mathematics performance and randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The control group received regular instruction, while the experimental group received enhanced modules focusing on core fraction operations. Numerical results showed a significant improvement in the experimental group’s post-test performance (M = 21.38, SD = 4.91) compared to the control group (M = 13.98, SD = 4.83), with a computed t-value of 3.998, exceeding the critical value of 1.843 at a 0.05 significance level. This indicates a meaningful impact of the enhanced modules on mathematical competency. The study supports integrating modular learning with differentiated instruction, formative assessment, and scaffolded content as an effective intervention in addressing early-grade numeracy gaps. The findings suggest a need to institutionalize modular interventions to promote equitable learning outcomes across diverse learner profiles.



References:

  1. Bayocot, A. R. (2021). Learning continuity through modular distance learning: A case of mathematics instruction in the new normal. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development, 9(1), 45–58.
  2. Bayocot, D. (2021). Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Enhancing Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 4(4), 22–26.
  3. Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. (2020). The adolescent community of engagement framework: A model for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(1), 5–44.
  4. Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szücs, D. (2017). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 304.
  5. Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the Concrete–Representational–Abstract Sequence to Teach Subtraction with Regrouping to Students at Risk for Failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195–207.
  6. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
  7. Patahuddin, S. M., Ghazali, M., & Rosli, R. (2018). Innovative pedagogical strategies in mathematics: Learning modules as an instructional tool. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 123–135.
  8. Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Barnes, M. E. (2021). Tiered mathematics interventions: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 368–401.
  9. Tomas, L. C., & Lasaten, R. C. (2020). Development and Effectiveness of Differentiated Modules in Enhancing Mathematics Performance of Grade 6 Pupils. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(12), 521–529.
  10. Tomas, R. M. N., & Lasaten, R. C. (2020). Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction Using Modular Approach in Enhancing the Mathematics Performance of Grade 8 Students. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(6), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.06.2020.p10228
  11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  12. Zhang, D., Trussell, R. P., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. (2022). Students’ perceptions of mathematics: Understanding the role of engagement and instructional practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–13.