Ethical Behavior, Productivity, and Effectiveness of Goal-Setting on the Performance of Non-Academic Scholars

Nenita  I. Prado,; Rhey Manuel  Siao Jr.,; Leonila  Caga,

Ethical Behavior, Productivity, and Effectiveness of Goal-Setting on the Performance of Non-Academic Scholars

Leonila Caga | Rhey Manuel Siao Jr. | Nenita I. Prado

Abstract:

This study examined the relationship between ethical behavior, productivity, and effectiveness of goal-setting on the performance of non-academic scholars within a university setting. By assessing these key factors, the research aimed to provide meaningful insights into how ethical conduct influences work efficiency, how productivity contributes to task completion and achievement of departmental goals, and how structured goal-setting strategies enhance scholars' performance. The study employed a combination of descriptive correlational, and causal research designs. A sample of 139 selected faculty members and administrative staff who directly engaged with non-academic scholars participated by responding to a survey questionnaire used for data collection. The findings revealed that ethical behavior significantly influenced scholars’ sense of accountability, work commitment, and adherence to institutional policies. Productivity was found to be strongly associated with task efficiency, quality of output, and effective time management. Furthermore, goal-setting strategies were shown to improve task clarity, motivation, and performance outcomes. The study also underscored the importance of implementing structured evaluation systems. These include policies such as grant readjustment for scholars with attendance issues, performance-based allowances for those who consistently demonstrate excellence and establishment of mentorship programs was recommended to further support and guide scholars in their roles. Overall, the findings offer valuable recommendations for institutions, policymakers, supervisors, faculty, staff, and non-academic scholars aimed at enhancing ethical behavior, increasing productivity, and improving the effectiveness of goal-setting within the university environment.

References:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Brown, K., Miller, S., & Thompson, R. (2023). Advanced research methodologies: Establishing causality in social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Doe, J. (2022). Statistical methods in behavioral research: Multiple regression and predictive modeling. Sage Publications.
Doe, J., & Smith, A. (2021). Applied statistics in research: Sampling techniques and data analysis. Oxford University Press.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Garcia, L., & Ramos, D. (2024). Enhancing productivity in academic support services: Strategies for efficiency and effectiveness. Manila: Academic Press.
Johnson, P., & Lee, M. (2024). Mixed-methods research in education and social sciences: Integrating correlational and causal designs. Routledge.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Resnik, D. B. (2023). The ethics of research, academic integrity, and university governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2021). Quantitative research approaches: Descriptive and correlational designs in social science studies. Oxford University Press.
Tan, W. L., & Chong, M. P. (2022). Goal-setting and job satisfaction: Aligning motivation with institutional objectives. Asian Journal of Management Studies, 14(3), 45-62.
Villanueva, R., & Santos, P. (2021). Ethical norms and institutional transparency in the Philippines: Challenges and prospects. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 120-138.