Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 3 no. 3 (2025)

The Mediating Role of Mathematics Proficiency on the Relationship Between Mathematics Instruction and Attitudes Toward Learning Mathematics

Christian N. Jumabong | Jonelson C. Escandallo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The growing concern about students’ attitudes toward mathematics and their overall proficiency continues to challenge educational institutions in fostering effective learning environments. This quantitative non-experimental study aimed to determine the mediating effect of mathematics proficiency on the relationship between perceived quality of mathematics instruction and students’ attitudes toward learning mathematics. The study involved 285 non-licensure track students selected from a population of 991 enrolled in Mathematics in the Modern World at Kapalong College of Agriculture, Sciences, and Technology (KCAST) during the Academic Year 2023–2024. These students were enrolled in non-board degree programs, specifically, the Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and the Bachelor of Science in Office Administration, which do not require professional licensure upon graduation. The sample size was determined using Slovin’s formula with a 0.05 margin of error, and participants were selected through stratified random sampling with proportional allocation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and mediation analysis through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results revealed that mathematics instruction was rated very high, while proficiency and attitudes were high. A weak but significant correlation was found between proficiency and attitudes (r = .181), and the indirect mediation effect was non-significant. Thus, instructional quality appears to influence student attitudes independently of proficiency. Findings highlight the need for educators to prioritize instructional strategies that improve attitudes even among students with low proficiency.



References:

  1. Abd Algani, Y. M. (2022). Role, need and benefits of mathematics in the development of society. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 3(1), 23-29. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmetp/issue/70512/1129875
  2. Adam, H. B. (2024). The impact of early math and numeracy skills on academic achievement in elementary school. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(4). https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/4-IJAMS-APRIL-2024-97-107.pdf
  3. Aguhayon, H., Tingson, R., & Pentang, J. (2023). Addressing students learning gaps in mathematics through differentiated instruction. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.53378/352967
  4. Ahmad, F., Saguni, F., & Rustina, R. (2019). The Role of Teachers and Families in Improving Motivation and Learning Outcomes of Students. International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 1(1), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcied.Vol1.Iss1.6
  5. Albano, G., Antonini, S., & Miranda, A. (2022). Cognitive roles in cooperative problem solving at university level. In Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12) (No. 16). https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1286372
  6. Algani, Y. M., & Eshan, J. (2019). Reasons and suggested solutions for low-level academic achievement in mathematics. International e-Journal of Educational Studies (IEJES), 3(6), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.604884
  7. Asoy, E. M. P., & Dagohoy, R. G. (2023). Assessing the Factors of Academic Achievement in Mathematics in the Modern World Using Structural Equation Modeling. Philippine Social Science Journal, 6(2), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v6i2.723
  8. Bature, I. J., & Campus, C. (2020). The Mathematics teachers shift from the traditional teacher-centred classroom to a more constructivist student-centred epistemology. Open Access Library Journal, 7(05), 1. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106389
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080
  11. Fashant, Z., Ross, S., Russell, L., LaPlant, K., Jacobson, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2023). Designing effective teaching and significant learning. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Designing-Effective-Teaching-and-Significant-Learning/Fashant-Ross-Russell-LaPlant-Jacobson-Hutchinson/p/book/9781642670059
  12. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com/unitas/highered/changes/fraenkel-how-to-design-and-evaluate-research-in-education-10e.pdf
  13. Go, M. C. (2023). Enhancing mathematical proficiency assessment: Insights from mathematics teachers. Science International, 35, 773-780. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375828757_ENHANCING_MATHEMATICAL_PROFICIENCY_ASSESSMENT_INSIGHTS_FROM_MATHEMATICS_TEACHERS
  14. Hwang, S., & Son, T. (2021). Students' Attitude toward Mathematics and Its Relationship with Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(3), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.83.272.280
  15. Kohen, Z., & Orenstein, D. (2021). Mathematical modeling of tech-related real-world problems for secondary school-level mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10020-1
  16. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International. https://repository.dinus.ac.id/docs/ajar/Kothari_-_Research_Methodology_Methods_and_Techniques_-_2004.pdf
  17. Lapinid, M. R. C., Cordel II, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., Chua, U. C., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2022). Contrasting profiles of low-performing mathematics students in public and private schools in the Philippines: Insights from machine learning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030061
  18. Macdonald, K., Milne, N., Orr, R., & Pope, R. (2020). Associations between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in year 1 school children: A cross-sectional study. BMC pediatrics, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8
  19. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
  20. Nabila, L. A., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Self-esteem in mathematics learning: How to develop it through contextual teaching and learning approach?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1581, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012049
  21. Nilimaa, J. (2023). New examination approach for real-world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics. Trends in Higher Education, 2(3), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028
  22. Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988
  23. Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., Andleeb, I., & Kong, W. (2023). Altering students’ attitude toward math learning through project-based learning: A math project [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2692214/v1
  24. Sanchal, A., & Sharma, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes toward learning mathematics: Impact of teaching in a sporting context. Teachers and Curriculum, 17(1), 89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v17i1.151
  25. Schlesinger, L., Jentsch, A., & Kaiser, G. (2018). Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(3), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5
  26. Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2022). Implications of under-confidence and over-confidence in mathematics at secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102085
  27. Sitopu, J. W., Khairani, M., Roza, M., Judijanto, L., & Aslan, A. (2024). The importance of integrating mathematical literacy in the primary education curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 121-134. https://injotel.org/index.php/12/article/view/54
  28. Vedianty, A. S. A., Nurhayati, D., Darmayanti, R., & Lestari, A. S. B. (2022). MANIS: Mathematics, analysis, and mathematical communication. How is the student's self-confidence?. AMCA Journal of Education and Behavioral Change, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.51773/ajeb.v2i2.277
  29. Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801
  30. Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: An in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon, 10(6), e27706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27706

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic